Comparative Analysis of the Establishment of Chinese and American Think Tanks

IF 6.3 2区社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Foreign Affairs Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.46493/2663-2675.31(5).2021.44-51

Wei Lu

{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Establishment of Chinese and American Think Tanks","authors":"Wei Lu","doi":"10.46493/2663-2675.31(5).2021.44-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study is due to the need for a comparative analysis of the establishment of think tanks in the United States and the People’s Republic of China. In this regard, this article aims to identify the main factors influencing the quality of think tanks, disclosure of universal methods of modernization and quality control of think tanks around the world, description of the main aspects of establishing think tanks, predict and justify possible consequences of think tanks in the paradigm of different political regimes for local political systems, citizens of the country and the international community as a whole. The leading method in this study is systems analysis, which can be used to carry out a comparative analysis of the establishment of Chinese and American think tanks. Also in the process of writing this article were used such research methods as: the method of logical analysis, comparative method, methods of synthesis and deduction, the method of classification. The article presents the results of the analysis, reveals the main factors influencing the quality of think tanks, identifies universal methods of modernization and quality control of think tanks around the world, describes the main aspects of founding think tanks, predicted and justified the possible consequences of think tanks in the paradigm of different political regimes for local political systems, citizens of the country and the international community as a whole; the results are presented in the form of tables and figures. The materials of the article are of practical value for teachers and students of higher educational institutions in the field of sociology and analytics and politicians","PeriodicalId":12371,"journal":{"name":"Foreign Affairs","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foreign Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46493/2663-2675.31(5).2021.44-51","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the study is due to the need for a comparative analysis of the establishment of think tanks in the United States and the People’s Republic of China. In this regard, this article aims to identify the main factors influencing the quality of think tanks, disclosure of universal methods of modernization and quality control of think tanks around the world, description of the main aspects of establishing think tanks, predict and justify possible consequences of think tanks in the paradigm of different political regimes for local political systems, citizens of the country and the international community as a whole. The leading method in this study is systems analysis, which can be used to carry out a comparative analysis of the establishment of Chinese and American think tanks. Also in the process of writing this article were used such research methods as: the method of logical analysis, comparative method, methods of synthesis and deduction, the method of classification. The article presents the results of the analysis, reveals the main factors influencing the quality of think tanks, identifies universal methods of modernization and quality control of think tanks around the world, describes the main aspects of founding think tanks, predicted and justified the possible consequences of think tanks in the paradigm of different political regimes for local political systems, citizens of the country and the international community as a whole; the results are presented in the form of tables and figures. The materials of the article are of practical value for teachers and students of higher educational institutions in the field of sociology and analytics and politicians

查看原文本刊更多论文

中美智库建设的比较分析

该研究的相关性是由于需要对美国和中华人民共和国建立智库进行比较分析。在这方面，本文旨在识别影响智库质量的主要因素，揭示世界范围内智库现代化的普遍方法和质量控制，描述建立智库的主要方面，预测和证明在不同政治制度范式下，智库对地方政治制度、国家公民以及整个国际社会可能产生的后果。本研究的主要方法是系统分析法，可以对中美智库的建立进行比较分析。在本文的写作过程中，运用了逻辑分析法、比较法、综合推演法、分类法等研究方法。文章介绍了分析结果，揭示了影响智库质量的主要因素，确定了世界范围内智库现代化和质量控制的普遍方法，描述了智库创建的主要方面，预测并论证了不同政体范式下智库对地方政治制度、国家公民以及整个国际社会可能产生的后果;结果以表格和图表的形式呈现出来。本文的材料对社会学、分析学和政治学领域的高等院校师生具有实用价值

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Foreign Affairs INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1922, Foreign Affairs is a prominent American magazine that focuses on international relations and U.S. foreign policy. It is published by the Council on Foreign Relations, an esteemed nonpartisan think tank and membership organization dedicated to analyzing U.S. foreign policy and global affairs. While the print magazine is released every two months, the website offers daily articles and publishes anthologies every other month.