Psychometric evaluation of the polish version of the MINI-ICF-APP – a concise measure of limitations on activity and restrictions on participation according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) – in people with mental disorders

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHIATRY

Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.5114/PPN.2018.78715

J. Wciórka, M. Anczewska, Piotr Jahołkowski, P. Świtaj

{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the polish version of the MINI-ICF-APP – a concise measure of limitations on activity and restrictions on participation according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) – in people with mental disorders","authors":"J. Wciórka, M. Anczewska, Piotr Jahołkowski, P. Świtaj","doi":"10.5114/PPN.2018.78715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The Mini-ICF-APP is a simple, practical tool measuring activity limitations and participation restrictions in mental disorders according to the principles and categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The aim of the study was to determine the basic psychometric properties of the Polish language version of the Mini-ICF-APP. Method: A total of 58 patients in the early stages of recovery were included. Each of them was independently assessed by three clinicians with varied professional backgrounds (psychiatrists, psychologists and other therapists) using the Mini-ICF-APP and measures of psychopathology (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale – BPRS) and level of psychosocial functioning (Global Assessment of Functioning Scale – GAF; Personal and Social Performance Scale – PSP). Feasibility, reliability (internal consistency and inter-rater agreement), and validity (content, criterion and construct) were analysed. Results: Feasibility was concluded on the basis of positive feedback from clinicians, diversity of distribution and good item performance. Internal consistency was high, both when analysed jointly and separately for particular groups of clinicians. Measures of inter-rater agreement reached high values for the scale and were significant for each item. Criterion validity was indicated by high correlations with the GAF and the PSP, and slightly weaker with the BPRS. The construct validity of the Mini-ICF-APP was inferred ISSN: 1230-2813 volume 26 / Issue 1 2017 ADVANCES IN PSYCHIATRY & NEUROLOGY","PeriodicalId":39142,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5114/PPN.2018.78715","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/PPN.2018.78715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: The Mini-ICF-APP is a simple, practical tool measuring activity limitations and participation restrictions in mental disorders according to the principles and categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The aim of the study was to determine the basic psychometric properties of the Polish language version of the Mini-ICF-APP. Method: A total of 58 patients in the early stages of recovery were included. Each of them was independently assessed by three clinicians with varied professional backgrounds (psychiatrists, psychologists and other therapists) using the Mini-ICF-APP and measures of psychopathology (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale – BPRS) and level of psychosocial functioning (Global Assessment of Functioning Scale – GAF; Personal and Social Performance Scale – PSP). Feasibility, reliability (internal consistency and inter-rater agreement), and validity (content, criterion and construct) were analysed. Results: Feasibility was concluded on the basis of positive feedback from clinicians, diversity of distribution and good item performance. Internal consistency was high, both when analysed jointly and separately for particular groups of clinicians. Measures of inter-rater agreement reached high values for the scale and were significant for each item. Criterion validity was indicated by high correlations with the GAF and the PSP, and slightly weaker with the BPRS. The construct validity of the Mini-ICF-APP was inferred ISSN: 1230-2813 volume 26 / Issue 1 2017 ADVANCES IN PSYCHIATRY & NEUROLOGY

查看原文本刊更多论文

对波兰版MINI-ICF-APP进行心理测量评估——根据国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)，对精神障碍患者的活动限制和参与限制进行简明衡量

目的:Mini-ICF-APP是一种简单实用的工具，根据国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的原则和类别，测量精神障碍的活动限制和参与限制。本研究的目的是确定波兰语版Mini-ICF-APP的基本心理测量特性。方法:对58例早期康复患者进行回顾性分析。每位患者由三名具有不同专业背景的临床医生(精神病学家、心理学家和其他治疗师)独立评估，使用Mini-ICF-APP和精神病理学(简短精神病学评定量表- BPRS)和社会心理功能水平(整体功能评估量表- GAF;个人与社会表现量表(PSP)。分析了可行性、信度(内部一致性和内部一致性)和效度(内容、标准和结构)。结果:临床医师反馈积极，项目分布多样，项目表现良好，得出可行性结论。内部一致性很高，无论是联合分析还是单独分析特定临床医生群体。评价者之间的一致程度在量表中达到很高的值，对每个项目都很重要。标准效度与GAF和PSP的相关性较高，与BPRS的相关性稍弱。Mini-ICF-APP的结构效度被推断ISSN: 1230-2813 volume 26 / Issue 1 2017 ADVANCES IN PSYCHIATRY & NEUROLOGY

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Postepy Psychiatrii i Neurologii Psychology-Clinical Psychology

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The quarterly Advances in Psychiatry and Neurology is aimed at psychiatrists, neurologists as well as scientists working in related areas of basic and clinical research, psychology, social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports, and - at the initiative of the Editorial Board – reflections or experiences on currently vivid theoretical and practical questions or controversies. Articles submitted to the journal are evaluated first by the Section Editors, specialists in the fields of psychiatry, clinical psychology, science of the brain and mind and neurology, and reviewed by acknowledged authorities in the respective field. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.