Agent-based models and methodological individualism: are they fundamentally linked?

Q3 Social Sciences
Gianluca Manzo
{"title":"Agent-based models and methodological individualism: are they fundamentally linked?","authors":"Gianluca Manzo","doi":"10.3917/anso.201.0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses recent scholarship on whether or not the association between agent-based computational models and methodological individualism is justified. It is argued that these analyses are problematic because they start with a specific understanding of methodological individualism, which makes their conclusion contingent on the chosen view of what this perspective either is or is not. To overcome this problem, the paper proposes to think of both agent-based models and methodological individualism as “generic instruments,” i.e. devices with properties that are transversal to explanatory problems, fields, and disciplines. Within this framework, it appears that agent-based models and methodological individualism share some basic principles irrespective of the entities and levels of analysis involved by the explanatory problem under examination. In this sense, this study claims, they are essentially linked.","PeriodicalId":39529,"journal":{"name":"L''Annee Sociologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L''Annee Sociologique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/anso.201.0197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The article discusses recent scholarship on whether or not the association between agent-based computational models and methodological individualism is justified. It is argued that these analyses are problematic because they start with a specific understanding of methodological individualism, which makes their conclusion contingent on the chosen view of what this perspective either is or is not. To overcome this problem, the paper proposes to think of both agent-based models and methodological individualism as “generic instruments,” i.e. devices with properties that are transversal to explanatory problems, fields, and disciplines. Within this framework, it appears that agent-based models and methodological individualism share some basic principles irrespective of the entities and levels of analysis involved by the explanatory problem under examination. In this sense, this study claims, they are essentially linked.
基于主体的模型和方法论个人主义:它们是否有根本联系?
本文讨论了最近关于基于主体的计算模型和方法论个人主义之间的联系是否合理的学术研究。有人认为,这些分析是有问题的,因为它们是从对方法论个人主义的特定理解开始的,这使得它们的结论取决于所选择的观点,即这种观点是什么或不是什么。为了克服这个问题,本文建议将基于主体的模型和方法论个人主义都视为“通用工具”,即具有与解释问题、领域和学科横向的属性的设备。在这个框架内,似乎基于主体的模型和方法论个人主义共享一些基本原则,而不考虑所研究的解释问题所涉及的实体和分析水平。从这个意义上说,这项研究声称,它们本质上是联系在一起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
L''Annee Sociologique
L''Annee Sociologique Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: L’Année sociologique, fondée par Émile Durkheim en 1898, est la première et la plus ancienne des revues scientifiques propres aux sciences sociales. La célébration de son centenaire a coïncidé avec de notables transformations, notamment le passage à une périodicité semestrielle. L’Année sociologique est désormais mieux en prise sur les évolutions que connait ce domaine du savoir, et a fait le choix de privilégier la publication de numéros thématiques en alternance avec des volumes de varia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信