A Pilot Study in Latent Print Conflict Management

Abstract

Due to its subjective nature, the latent print comparison methodology possesses inherent potential for disagreement between experts examining the same friction ridge impressions. To regulate these differences, management of latent print sections typically involves conflict resolution policies that outline appropriate action for handling differences of opinion regarding friction ridge impressions. As the forensic science culture shifts toward standardization, what approach is the appropriate way to resolve these situations? This study analyzes responses from surveyed latent print examiners in an attempt to develop a recommendation through the analysis of current methods for mitigating conflict. Results show inconsistent handling of conflict resolution across respondent agencies.