The Turing Test, or a Misuse of Language when Ascribing Mental Qualities to Machines

Q4 Arts and Humanities
J. Bremer, M. Flasiński
{"title":"The Turing Test, or a Misuse of Language when Ascribing Mental Qualities to Machines","authors":"J. Bremer, M. Flasiński","doi":"10.35765/forphil.2022.2701.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The views on the Turing test of the four influential thinkers who belong to the tradition of analytic philosophy, namely Ludwig Wittgenstein, Noam Chomsky, Hilary Putnam and John R. Searle, are discussed in the paper. Based on various philosophical/linguistic beliefs, they differ in their assessment of both the significance and the suitability of the imitation game for the development of cognitive science and Artificial Intelligence models. At the same time, they share the rejection of treating TT as the test for the “thinking of machines”. It seems to result from the caring for the proper use of language which is the fundamental methodological commitment of analytic philosophy.","PeriodicalId":34385,"journal":{"name":"Forum Philosophicum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum Philosophicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35765/forphil.2022.2701.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The views on the Turing test of the four influential thinkers who belong to the tradition of analytic philosophy, namely Ludwig Wittgenstein, Noam Chomsky, Hilary Putnam and John R. Searle, are discussed in the paper. Based on various philosophical/linguistic beliefs, they differ in their assessment of both the significance and the suitability of the imitation game for the development of cognitive science and Artificial Intelligence models. At the same time, they share the rejection of treating TT as the test for the “thinking of machines”. It seems to result from the caring for the proper use of language which is the fundamental methodological commitment of analytic philosophy.
图灵测试,或者把精神品质归因于机器时的语言误用
本文讨论了属于分析哲学传统的四位有影响的思想家,即维特根斯坦、乔姆斯基、帕特南和塞尔对图灵测试的看法。基于不同的哲学/语言学信仰,他们对模仿游戏对认知科学和人工智能模型发展的重要性和适用性的评估存在差异。与此同时,他们都反对将TT视为“机器思维”的测试。它似乎源于对语言的恰当使用的关注,这是分析哲学的基本方法论承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信