We've Got a Problem: Impolite Speculations on Higher Education.

Edward L. Galligan
{"title":"We've Got a Problem: Impolite Speculations on Higher Education.","authors":"Edward L. Galligan","doi":"10.2307/40225014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NOTE: To the charge that these speculations lack supporting data, the author, an irascible fifty-year-old Professor of English, pleads innocent by reason of sanity, for no sane man would spend time doing research on the behavior of academic officials when he could be studying Don Quixote or Huckleberry Finn. To the charge that in view of the subjects they deal with these speculations are shockingly lacking in profanity, he pleads, like Spiro Agnew, nolo contendere.","PeriodicalId":87494,"journal":{"name":"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors","volume":"63 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40225014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAUP bulletin : quarterly publication of the American Association of University Professors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40225014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

NOTE: To the charge that these speculations lack supporting data, the author, an irascible fifty-year-old Professor of English, pleads innocent by reason of sanity, for no sane man would spend time doing research on the behavior of academic officials when he could be studying Don Quixote or Huckleberry Finn. To the charge that in view of the subjects they deal with these speculations are shockingly lacking in profanity, he pleads, like Spiro Agnew, nolo contendere.
我们有一个问题:对高等教育不礼貌的猜测。
注:对于这些推测缺乏支持数据的指控,作者,一个脾气暴躁的50岁的英语教授,以理智为理由辩解自己是无辜的,因为没有一个理智的人会花时间研究学术官员的行为,而他可以研究堂吉诃德或哈克贝利·费恩。有人指责说,鉴于他们处理这些猜测的主题,令人震惊地缺乏亵渎,他像斯皮罗·阿格纽(Spiro Agnew)一样辩解说,没有人反对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信