Status Manipulation in Chae Chan Ping v. United States

IF 2.1 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

Michigan Law Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.36644/mlr.121.6.status

Sam Erman

引用次数: 1

Abstract

A Review of Chae Chan Ping v. United States. By Rose Cuison-Villazor in Critical Race Judgments: Rewritten U.S. Court Opinions on Race and the Law 74, 84. Edited by Bennett Capers, Devon W. Carbado, R.A. Lenhardt and Angela Onwuachi-Willig.

查看原文本刊更多论文

蔡灿平诉美国的地位操纵案

蔡陈平诉美国案述评。罗斯·奎森-维拉佐著，《关键的种族判决:重写美国法院关于种族和法律的意见》，第74卷，第84页。本内特·卡佩斯、德文·w·卡巴多、R.A.伦哈特和安吉拉·翁武契-威利编辑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Michigan Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

3.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Michigan Law Review is a journal of legal scholarship. Eight issues are published annually. Seven of each volume"s eight issues ordinarily are composed of two major parts: Articles by legal scholars and practitioners, and Notes written by the student editors. One issue in each volume is devoted to book reviews. Occasionally, special issues are devoted to symposia or colloquia. First Impressions, the online companion to the Michigan Law Review, publishes op-ed length articles by academics, judges, and practitioners on current legal issues. This extension of the printed journal facilitates quick dissemination of the legal community’s initial impressions of important judicial decisions, legislative developments, and timely legal policy issues.