MIGRAÇÃO E MOBILIDADE PENDULAR NAS METRÓPOLES CEARENSES: INTEGRAÇÃO OU FRAGMENTAÇÃO?

Isac Alves Correia
{"title":"MIGRAÇÃO E MOBILIDADE PENDULAR NAS METRÓPOLES CEARENSES: INTEGRAÇÃO OU FRAGMENTAÇÃO?","authors":"Isac Alves Correia","doi":"10.21452/RDE.V1I45.6388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to analyze and to compare the relationship between pendular mobility and migration in the RMF and in the RMC, both in the state of Ceara. The 2010 Census microdata is the main source of information. The methodology adopted consists of logistic regression models to estimate the chance of migrating and performing pendular mobility simultaneously and selectivity. The results indicate that migrants are more likely to work for OR (1,602) or study (OR = 4.091) in RMF, whereas in MRC this proposition is valid only for work pendulum (OR = 1.572). In addition, sex and age, among other factors, may significantly influence the migration condition and the pendular mobility.","PeriodicalId":32938,"journal":{"name":"RDE Revista de Desenvolvimento Economico","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RDE Revista de Desenvolvimento Economico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21452/RDE.V1I45.6388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze and to compare the relationship between pendular mobility and migration in the RMF and in the RMC, both in the state of Ceara. The 2010 Census microdata is the main source of information. The methodology adopted consists of logistic regression models to estimate the chance of migrating and performing pendular mobility simultaneously and selectivity. The results indicate that migrants are more likely to work for OR (1,602) or study (OR = 4.091) in RMF, whereas in MRC this proposition is valid only for work pendulum (OR = 1.572). In addition, sex and age, among other factors, may significantly influence the migration condition and the pendular mobility.
ceara大都市的移民与通勤:一体化还是碎片化?
本研究的目的是分析和比较在塞阿拉州RMF和RMC的摆动流动性和迁移之间的关系。2010年人口普查微数据是信息的主要来源。所采用的方法包括逻辑回归模型,以估计迁移的机会,同时执行摆式迁移和选择性。结果表明,移民更有可能在RMF工作(1,602)或学习(OR = 4.091),而在MRC中,这一命题仅适用于工作摆(OR = 1.572)。此外,性别和年龄等因素可能显著影响迁移条件和摆式流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信