A Reader's Guide to Pre-Modern Procedure

IF 0.2 4区社会学 Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Legal Education Pub Date : 2015-03-30 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2587358

David L. Noll

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many sources describe the general badness of procedural systems that predated the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure but few describe how those systems actually worked. This essay — intended as a reference for law students, law professors, and anyone else required to read and make sense of archaic judicial opinions — does just that.

查看原文本刊更多论文

前现代程序的读者指南

许多资料描述了早于《联邦民事诉讼规则》的程序制度的普遍弊端，但很少有资料描述这些制度实际上是如何运作的。这篇文章——作为法律学生、法律教授和任何需要阅读和理解古代司法意见的人的参考——就是这样做的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Legal Education Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Legal Education (ISSN 0022-2208) is a quarterly publication of the Association of American Law Schools. The primary purpose of the Journal is to foster a rich interchange of ideas and information about legal education and related matters, including but not limited to the legal profession, legal theory, and legal scholarship. With a readership of more than 10,000 law teachers and about 500 subscribers, the Journal offers an unusually effective medium for communication to the law school world.