Visioenen als literaire mystagogie : Stand van zaken en nieuwe inzichten over intentie en functie van Hadewijchs Visioenen

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Veerle Fraeters
{"title":"Visioenen als literaire mystagogie : Stand van zaken en nieuwe inzichten over intentie en functie van Hadewijchs Visioenen","authors":"Veerle Fraeters","doi":"10.2143/OGE.73.2.2003351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In their reviews of the Willaert edition (1996), Jo Reynaert en Geert Warnar questioned, each from a different perspective, Willaerts thesis that Hadewijchs Visions were intended, and functioned, as didactic texts. Simultaneously, the German philologist Hofmann presented his own view on the function of the Visions in his recent edition of these texts (1998). This article offers a state of the arts of the current hypotheses and incorporates them in a new synthesis: the personal lyrical language and the striking claims of authority, both thought to be incongruent with a primary didactic function, are shown to be essential components of the mystagogic intention and function of Hadewijchs Visions.","PeriodicalId":39580,"journal":{"name":"Ons Geestelijk Erf","volume":"73 1","pages":"111-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ons Geestelijk Erf","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/OGE.73.2.2003351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In their reviews of the Willaert edition (1996), Jo Reynaert en Geert Warnar questioned, each from a different perspective, Willaerts thesis that Hadewijchs Visions were intended, and functioned, as didactic texts. Simultaneously, the German philologist Hofmann presented his own view on the function of the Visions in his recent edition of these texts (1998). This article offers a state of the arts of the current hypotheses and incorporates them in a new synthesis: the personal lyrical language and the striking claims of authority, both thought to be incongruent with a primary didactic function, are shown to be essential components of the mystagogic intention and function of Hadewijchs Visions.
幻象是文学上的神秘:关于hadewijch幻象的意图和功能的现状和新见解
在对Willaert版(1996)的评论中,Jo Reynaert和Geert Warnar分别从不同的角度质疑Willaert的论点,即Hadewijchs Visions的目的和功能是作为说教文本。同时,德国语言学家霍夫曼(Hofmann)在他最近的文本版本(1998年)中提出了他自己对异象功能的看法。本文提供了当前假设的艺术状态,并将它们整合到一个新的综合中:个人抒情语言和引人注目的权威主张,这两者都被认为与主要的教学功能不一致,被证明是哈德威奇幻觉的神秘意图和功能的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ons Geestelijk Erf
Ons Geestelijk Erf Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ons Geestelijk Erf is een driemaandelijks tijdschrift gewijd aan de geschiedenis van de spiritualiteit in de Nederlanden. Het bestrijkt de periode vanaf de kerstening van de Nederlanden tot het einde van het Ancien Régime. Het tijdschrift werd in 1927 gesticht door D.A. Stracke s.j. († 1970) en het wordt sindsdien door het Ruusbroecgenootschap, dat in 1973 werd opgenomen in de Universitaire Faculteiten Sint-Ignatius te Antwerpen. Sinds 2003 maakt het Ruusbroecgenootschap deel uit van Universiteit Antwerpen als Instituut voor de geschiedenis van de spiritualiteit in de Nederlanden tot ca. 1750.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信