SELECTION OF THE SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE MOST COMPATIBLE WITH NATURE, REQUIREMENTS AND RESOURCES OF MINING PROJECTS USING AN INTEGRATED FOLCHI-AHP METHOD

IF 1.2 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arman Hazrathosseini
{"title":"SELECTION OF THE SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE MOST COMPATIBLE WITH NATURE, REQUIREMENTS AND RESOURCES OF MINING PROJECTS USING AN INTEGRATED FOLCHI-AHP METHOD","authors":"Arman Hazrathosseini","doi":"10.17794/rgn.2022.3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are numerous safety risk analysis techniques. Moreover, no ideal method exists for all companies; hence, the selection of the method most congruous with nature of the intended project, as well as the needs and resources of a mining company is of particular significance. To address the issue, a mathematical model has been developed with the aid of the Folchi-AHP method, whereby safety experts can opt for the best technique after multiplying an impacting factors matrix by a correlation matrix. The former is created by the safety team in the decision-making time, and includes 15 evaluation criteria, while the latter is comprised of the relative weight of each criterion to each technique. To find these weights, 22 methods were compared to each other in terms of 15 criteria by 10 safety experts using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). To ease computations, an Excel program was developed and investigated in four mining projects.","PeriodicalId":44536,"journal":{"name":"Rudarsko-Geolosko-Naftni Zbornik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rudarsko-Geolosko-Naftni Zbornik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17794/rgn.2022.3.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are numerous safety risk analysis techniques. Moreover, no ideal method exists for all companies; hence, the selection of the method most congruous with nature of the intended project, as well as the needs and resources of a mining company is of particular significance. To address the issue, a mathematical model has been developed with the aid of the Folchi-AHP method, whereby safety experts can opt for the best technique after multiplying an impacting factors matrix by a correlation matrix. The former is created by the safety team in the decision-making time, and includes 15 evaluation criteria, while the latter is comprised of the relative weight of each criterion to each technique. To find these weights, 22 methods were compared to each other in terms of 15 criteria by 10 safety experts using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). To ease computations, an Excel program was developed and investigated in four mining projects.
采用综合folchi-ahp方法选择最符合矿山项目性质、需求和资源的安全风险分析技术
有许多安全风险分析技术。此外,不存在适用于所有公司的理想方法;因此,选择最符合拟建项目的性质以及矿业公司的需求和资源的方法就显得尤为重要。为了解决这个问题,在Folchi-AHP方法的帮助下,开发了一个数学模型,安全专家可以在将影响因素矩阵乘以相关矩阵后选择最佳技术。前者由安全团队在决策时创建,包括15个评价标准,后者由每个标准对每种技术的相对权重组成。为了确定这些权重,10名安全专家使用层次分析法(AHP)对22种方法进行了15项标准的比较。为了简化计算,开发了一个Excel程序,并在四个采矿项目中进行了研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信