Taking Compensation Private

IF 4.9 1区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences
Abraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky
{"title":"Taking Compensation Private","authors":"Abraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.806164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In light of the expansive interpretation of the \u001cpublic use\u001d requirement, the payment of \u001cjust compensation\u001d remains the only meaningful limit on the government's eminent domain power and, correspondingly, the only safeguard of private property owners' rights against abusive takings. Yet, the current compensation regime is suboptimal. While both efficiency and fairness require paying full compensation for seizures by eminent domain, current law limits the compensation to market value. Despite the virtual consensus about the inadequacy of market compensation, courts adhere to it for a purely practical reason: there is no way to measure the true subjective value of property to its owner. Subjective value is neither observable nor verifiable to third parties and courts cannot rely upon owners' reports of the value they attach to their properties. To date, the challenge of screening truthful from exaggerated evaluation has proven insurmountable.This Article solves the undercompensation conundrum. It offers a novel self-assessment mechanism that enables the payment of full compensation at subjective value when private property is taken by eminent domain. Under the proposed mechanism, property owners would get to set the price of the property designated for condemnation. The government could then either take the property at the designated price, or abstain, leaving the property subject to two new proposed restrictions. First, for the life of the owner, the property could not be sold for less than the self-assessed price, adjusted on the basis of the local housing price index. Second, the self-assessed price - discounted to take account of the peculiarities of property tax assessments - would become the new benchmark for the owner's property tax liability. The Article shows that under most conditions, these restrictions will induce honest reporting by owners, while reducing the transaction costs created by the compensation process. The result is a dramatically more efficient law of eminent domain that is also far more respectful of private property rights.","PeriodicalId":51386,"journal":{"name":"Stanford Law Review","volume":"59 1","pages":"871"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanford Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.806164","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

In light of the expansive interpretation of the public use requirement, the payment of just compensation remains the only meaningful limit on the government's eminent domain power and, correspondingly, the only safeguard of private property owners' rights against abusive takings. Yet, the current compensation regime is suboptimal. While both efficiency and fairness require paying full compensation for seizures by eminent domain, current law limits the compensation to market value. Despite the virtual consensus about the inadequacy of market compensation, courts adhere to it for a purely practical reason: there is no way to measure the true subjective value of property to its owner. Subjective value is neither observable nor verifiable to third parties and courts cannot rely upon owners' reports of the value they attach to their properties. To date, the challenge of screening truthful from exaggerated evaluation has proven insurmountable.This Article solves the undercompensation conundrum. It offers a novel self-assessment mechanism that enables the payment of full compensation at subjective value when private property is taken by eminent domain. Under the proposed mechanism, property owners would get to set the price of the property designated for condemnation. The government could then either take the property at the designated price, or abstain, leaving the property subject to two new proposed restrictions. First, for the life of the owner, the property could not be sold for less than the self-assessed price, adjusted on the basis of the local housing price index. Second, the self-assessed price - discounted to take account of the peculiarities of property tax assessments - would become the new benchmark for the owner's property tax liability. The Article shows that under most conditions, these restrictions will induce honest reporting by owners, while reducing the transaction costs created by the compensation process. The result is a dramatically more efficient law of eminent domain that is also far more respectful of private property rights.
将薪酬私有化
鉴于对公共使用要求的广泛解释,支付公正补偿仍然是对政府征用权的唯一有意义的限制,相应地,也是私有财产所有者权利免受滥用征用的唯一保障。然而,目前的薪酬制度并不理想。虽然效率和公平都要求为征用土地支付全额赔偿,但现行法律将赔偿限制在市场价值上。尽管对市场补偿的不足达成了实质上的共识,但法院出于纯粹的实际原因坚持这一点:没有办法衡量财产对其所有者的真实主观价值。主观价值既不能被第三方观察到,也不能被证实,法院不能依赖业主对其财产价值的报告。迄今为止,从夸大的评价中甄别真实的评价已被证明是难以克服的挑战。本文解决了薪酬不足的难题。它提供了一种新的自我评估机制,当私有财产被征用时,可以根据主观价值支付全额补偿。在拟议的机制下,业主将有权为指定的拆迁物业设定价格。然后,政府要么以指定价格收购这些房产,要么弃权,让这些房产受到两项新提议的限制。首先,对于业主的生命,房产不得低于根据当地房价指数调整的自评价格出售。第二,考虑到物业税评估的特殊性,自行评估的价格将成为业主物业税负债的新基准。文章表明,在大多数情况下,这些限制将促使业主诚实报告,同时降低补偿过程产生的交易成本。其结果是,土地征用法的效率显著提高,对私有产权的尊重也大大提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信