Fear of Facebook: Private Ordering of Social Media Risks Incurred by Healthcare Providers

N. Terry
{"title":"Fear of Facebook: Private Ordering of Social Media Risks Incurred by Healthcare Providers","authors":"N. Terry","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1908346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last two years have seen important quantitative and qualitative shifts in social media use patterns in the healthcare environment. Reacting to present and future risks there has been a rapid deployment of private ordering: social media policies and other contractual constructs emanating from physicians, professional organizations, employers and educators. These private, often contractual attempts to regulate online interactions or social media conduct are not all benign, themselves creating ethical or legal risk. This article, a follow-up to Physicians And Patients Who ‘Friend’ Or ‘Tweet’: Constructing A Legal Framework For Social Networking In A Highly Regulated Domain, 43 IND. L. REV. 285 (2010), concentrates on social media and these new risk management constructs. Part II provides updated statistics on Internet use by healthcare workers and explores some of the scenarios that have led medical schools and healthcare entities to expressly address social media behavior. Part III inquires into how professional organizations or those who employ or credential physicians have attempted to change the rules of the game by promulgating social media policies and analyses some of the legal constraints on those policies. Part IV deals with the reality of medically relevant information about patients increasingly moving online and asks whether physicians should attempt to access information that might be useful or even life-saving. Finally, Part V describes how the patient-physician dialog has increasingly spilled out of the consulting room and onto social media sites and explores how physicians should react not only to overtures for social media friendship but also to online critical patient comments.","PeriodicalId":82091,"journal":{"name":"Nebraska law review","volume":"90 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nebraska law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1908346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The last two years have seen important quantitative and qualitative shifts in social media use patterns in the healthcare environment. Reacting to present and future risks there has been a rapid deployment of private ordering: social media policies and other contractual constructs emanating from physicians, professional organizations, employers and educators. These private, often contractual attempts to regulate online interactions or social media conduct are not all benign, themselves creating ethical or legal risk. This article, a follow-up to Physicians And Patients Who ‘Friend’ Or ‘Tweet’: Constructing A Legal Framework For Social Networking In A Highly Regulated Domain, 43 IND. L. REV. 285 (2010), concentrates on social media and these new risk management constructs. Part II provides updated statistics on Internet use by healthcare workers and explores some of the scenarios that have led medical schools and healthcare entities to expressly address social media behavior. Part III inquires into how professional organizations or those who employ or credential physicians have attempted to change the rules of the game by promulgating social media policies and analyses some of the legal constraints on those policies. Part IV deals with the reality of medically relevant information about patients increasingly moving online and asks whether physicians should attempt to access information that might be useful or even life-saving. Finally, Part V describes how the patient-physician dialog has increasingly spilled out of the consulting room and onto social media sites and explores how physicians should react not only to overtures for social media friendship but also to online critical patient comments.
对Facebook的恐惧:医疗保健提供者对社交媒体风险的私人订购
过去两年,医疗环境中的社交媒体使用模式发生了重要的定量和定性变化。为了应对当前和未来的风险,私人订购已经迅速部署:社交媒体政策和其他来自医生、专业组织、雇主和教育工作者的合同结构。这些规范在线互动或社交媒体行为的私人、通常是契约式的尝试并不都是良性的,它们本身就会产生道德或法律风险。这篇文章是继《在高度监管的领域为社交网络构建法律框架》(43 IND. L. REV. 285, 2010)之后的一篇文章,主要关注社交媒体和这些新的风险管理结构。第二部分提供了医疗工作者使用互联网的最新统计数据,并探讨了一些导致医学院和医疗机构明确处理社交媒体行为的情况。第三部分探讨了专业组织或那些雇用或认证医生的人如何试图通过颁布社交媒体政策来改变游戏规则,并分析了这些政策的一些法律约束。第四部分讨论了关于病人的医学相关信息越来越多地转移到网上的现实,并询问医生是否应该尝试访问可能有用甚至挽救生命的信息。最后,第五部分描述了医患对话如何越来越多地从诊室扩展到社交媒体网站,并探讨了医生不仅应该如何应对社交媒体友谊的提议,还应该如何应对在线批评患者的评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信