“They Can Fight Their Own Fights”: Prejudice, Permissiveness, and Discrimination against Minorities

Q4 Psychology

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1590/0102.3772e39507.en

L. Andrade, Cláudio Vaz Torres, S. Safdar

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The tendency to be permissive in face of a discriminatory situation is called collusion. The present study aimed to define and characterize collusion, and identify the variables connected to it, considering the perspective of different identity groups. Participants were 31 individuals divided in seven focus groups. The analysis indicated four categories connected to collusion: a) Close Relations: valuable interactions through which individuals learn behavioral patterns that lead to permissiveness; b) Group Identity: social identities, and intergroup relations patterns; c) Situation: characteristics of the situation in which discrimination is observed; and d) Cost-Effective Balance: perception the individuals have regarding the impact of their actions on the context and the cost attached to it.

查看原文本刊更多论文

《他们可以打自己的仗》:对少数群体的偏见、纵容和歧视

面对歧视的情况，宽容的倾向被称为串通。本研究旨在从不同身份群体的角度出发，定义和表征串通行为，并识别与串通行为相关的变量。31名参与者被分成7个焦点小组。分析指出了与串通有关的四个类别:a)亲密关系:通过有价值的互动，个人学习导致宽容的行为模式;b)群体认同:社会认同和群体间关系模式;c)情境:观察到歧视的情境特征;d)成本效益平衡:个人对其行为对环境的影响及其附带成本的感知。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa is a journal published every three months by Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de Brasília [Institute of Psychology - University of Brasília]. It aims at publishing original papers related to Psychology that fit into the following categories: research report, theoretical study, report of professional experience, critical literature review, short communication, letter to editor, technical note, review. News may also be published at the editor"s discretion. The authors assume responsibility for the articles signed; opinions and considerations included in the articles do not necessarily express the standing point of the Editorial Board.