Carotid stenting with cerebral protection: first clinical experience using the PercuSurge GuardWire system.

M. Henry, M. Amor, I. Henry, C. Klonaris, Z. Chati, I. Masson, S. Kownator, F. Luizy, M. Hugel
{"title":"Carotid stenting with cerebral protection: first clinical experience using the PercuSurge GuardWire system.","authors":"M. Henry, M. Amor, I. Henry, C. Klonaris, Z. Chati, I. Masson, S. Kownator, F. Luizy, M. Hugel","doi":"10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0321:CSWCPF>2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: To study the feasibility and safety of carotid angioplasty and stenting using a new cerebral protection device that temporarily occludes the distal internal carotid artery (ICA). METHODS: Forty-eight high-risk patients (39 men, mean age 69.1 +/- 8 years, range 54 to 86) with 53 ICA stenoses underwent percutaneous angioplasty and stenting via the femoral approach under cerebral protection afforded by a 0.014-inch GuardWire balloon occlusion device. Mean stenosis was 82.1% +/- 9.65% (range 70 to 96) and mean lesion length was 16.0 +/- 7.5 mm (range 6 to 50). Thirty-three (62%) lesions were calcified, and 38 (72%) were ulcerated. Thirty-two (60%) of the lesions were asymptomatic. With the occlusion balloon inflated in the distal ICA, the lesion was dilated and stented. The area was cleaned by aspiration and flushed via an aspiration catheter advanced over the wire. Blood samples were collected from the external carotid artery (ECA) and analyzed to measure the size and number of particles collected. Computed tomography and neurological examinations were performed the day after the procedure. RESULTS: Immediate technical success was achieved in all patients with the implantation of 38 Palmaz stents, 8 Expander stents, and 11 Wallstents. Carotid occlusion was well tolerated in all patients but 1 who had multiple, severe carotid lesions and poor collateralization. Mean cerebral flow occlusion time was 346 +/- 153 seconds during predilation and 303 +/- 143 seconds during stent placement. Total mean flow occlusion time was 542 +/- 243 seconds. One immediate neurological complication (transient amaurosis) occurred in a patient who had an anastomosis between the external carotid (EC) and ICA territories. Debris was removed in all patients with a mean 0.8-mm diameter catheter. CONCLUSION: Cerebral protection with the GuardWire device is easy, safe, and effective in protecting the brain from cerebral embolism. Larger studies are warranted.","PeriodicalId":79443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"96","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0321:CSWCPF>2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 96

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the feasibility and safety of carotid angioplasty and stenting using a new cerebral protection device that temporarily occludes the distal internal carotid artery (ICA). METHODS: Forty-eight high-risk patients (39 men, mean age 69.1 +/- 8 years, range 54 to 86) with 53 ICA stenoses underwent percutaneous angioplasty and stenting via the femoral approach under cerebral protection afforded by a 0.014-inch GuardWire balloon occlusion device. Mean stenosis was 82.1% +/- 9.65% (range 70 to 96) and mean lesion length was 16.0 +/- 7.5 mm (range 6 to 50). Thirty-three (62%) lesions were calcified, and 38 (72%) were ulcerated. Thirty-two (60%) of the lesions were asymptomatic. With the occlusion balloon inflated in the distal ICA, the lesion was dilated and stented. The area was cleaned by aspiration and flushed via an aspiration catheter advanced over the wire. Blood samples were collected from the external carotid artery (ECA) and analyzed to measure the size and number of particles collected. Computed tomography and neurological examinations were performed the day after the procedure. RESULTS: Immediate technical success was achieved in all patients with the implantation of 38 Palmaz stents, 8 Expander stents, and 11 Wallstents. Carotid occlusion was well tolerated in all patients but 1 who had multiple, severe carotid lesions and poor collateralization. Mean cerebral flow occlusion time was 346 +/- 153 seconds during predilation and 303 +/- 143 seconds during stent placement. Total mean flow occlusion time was 542 +/- 243 seconds. One immediate neurological complication (transient amaurosis) occurred in a patient who had an anastomosis between the external carotid (EC) and ICA territories. Debris was removed in all patients with a mean 0.8-mm diameter catheter. CONCLUSION: Cerebral protection with the GuardWire device is easy, safe, and effective in protecting the brain from cerebral embolism. Larger studies are warranted.
脑保护颈动脉支架植入术:使用PercuSurge GuardWire系统的首次临床经验。
目的:研究一种暂时性闭塞颈动脉远端(ICA)的新型脑保护装置用于颈动脉成形术和支架植入术的可行性和安全性。方法:48例高危患者(39例男性,平均年龄69.1±8岁,54 ~ 86岁)53例ICA狭窄,在0.014英寸GuardWire球囊闭塞装置的脑保护下,经皮经股动脉入路血管成形术和支架植入术。平均狭窄为82.1% +/- 9.65%(范围70 - 96),平均病变长度为16.0 +/- 7.5 mm(范围6 - 50)。钙化33例(62%),溃烂38例(72%)。32例(60%)病变无症状。随着闭塞球囊在ICA远端膨胀,病变扩张并支架化。该区域通过抽吸清洁,并通过导线上方的抽吸导管冲洗。从颈外动脉(ECA)采集血液样本,分析并测量所采集颗粒的大小和数量。术后第二天进行计算机断层扫描和神经学检查。结果:38例Palmaz支架植入,8例Expander支架植入,11例wallstent植入,所有患者即刻获得技术成功。除1例颈动脉多发、严重病变和侧支不良的患者外,所有患者均耐受颈动脉闭塞。预扩张期间平均脑血流阻塞时间为346 +/- 153秒,支架置入期间平均脑血流阻塞时间为303 +/- 143秒。阻断血流的平均时间为542±243秒。在颈外动脉(EC)和颈内动脉(ICA)吻合的患者中发生了一个即时的神经系统并发症(一过性黑朦)。所有平均导管直径为0.8 mm的患者均清除了碎片。结论:GuardWire装置对脑栓塞患者的脑保护简便、安全、有效。更大规模的研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信