Validade das tabelas de peso fetal clássicas para a população Portuguesa

IF 1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ricardo Filipe Rodrigues Santos, Rui F. Miguelote, D. Coelho, Ana Maria de Andrade, Cristina Santos, João Bernardes, Ricardo Cruz-Correia
{"title":"Validade das tabelas de peso fetal clássicas para a população Portuguesa","authors":"Ricardo Filipe Rodrigues Santos, Rui F. Miguelote, D. Coelho, Ana Maria de Andrade, Cristina Santos, João Bernardes, Ricardo Cruz-Correia","doi":"10.1590/S0100-72032011000400003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: to assess the validity of several fetal weight charts, commonly used in Portugal, to classify its population. METHODS: observational retrospective study. Singleton birth data was analyzed, from a two- year period (May 2008 to April 2010), from pregnancies with an ultrasound in the same institution, between the 8th and 14th gestational week. Upon data validation, percentiles for each completed gestational week were created, smoothed by a quadratic function, analyzed and compared to the tables more commonly utilized, in the institution and country, by using Z-scores, percentile comparison, sample 10th percentile detection sensibility and birthweight means comparison. RESULTS: a total of 5,378 newborns (NB) were born in the period; 2,195 (42%) NB were included, born from the 24th to 42nd gestational week, allowing statistical analysis from the 34th to the 41st week. There were differences in the mean birthweight for each gestational age, between references and with the sample, as well as between sexes. The 10th percentile from some references has shown differences ranging from -288g at 37 weeks (-11% in Lubchenco et al. data), with and +133g at 34 weeks (+7,6% with Carrascosa et al. data) compared to the values found with the sample. Differences were also found concerning the sensitivity of the identification of a sample birthweight below the 10th percentile, which was between 14.1 and 100%, depending on the reference used. DISCUSSION: the limitation of these kinds of reference values must be remembered and minimized, with the adoption of regionally or nationally produced references, contemplating other variables, such as sex, with precisely known gestation duration and with validation of the utilized references in loco.","PeriodicalId":47257,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032011000400003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PURPOSE: to assess the validity of several fetal weight charts, commonly used in Portugal, to classify its population. METHODS: observational retrospective study. Singleton birth data was analyzed, from a two- year period (May 2008 to April 2010), from pregnancies with an ultrasound in the same institution, between the 8th and 14th gestational week. Upon data validation, percentiles for each completed gestational week were created, smoothed by a quadratic function, analyzed and compared to the tables more commonly utilized, in the institution and country, by using Z-scores, percentile comparison, sample 10th percentile detection sensibility and birthweight means comparison. RESULTS: a total of 5,378 newborns (NB) were born in the period; 2,195 (42%) NB were included, born from the 24th to 42nd gestational week, allowing statistical analysis from the 34th to the 41st week. There were differences in the mean birthweight for each gestational age, between references and with the sample, as well as between sexes. The 10th percentile from some references has shown differences ranging from -288g at 37 weeks (-11% in Lubchenco et al. data), with and +133g at 34 weeks (+7,6% with Carrascosa et al. data) compared to the values found with the sample. Differences were also found concerning the sensitivity of the identification of a sample birthweight below the 10th percentile, which was between 14.1 and 100%, depending on the reference used. DISCUSSION: the limitation of these kinds of reference values must be remembered and minimized, with the adoption of regionally or nationally produced references, contemplating other variables, such as sex, with precisely known gestation duration and with validation of the utilized references in loco.
经典胎儿体重表对葡萄牙人口的有效性
目的:评估几种胎儿体重图的有效性,通常使用在葡萄牙,分类其人口。方法:观察性回顾性研究。本研究分析了两年间(2008年5月至2010年4月)在同一医院接受超声检查、妊娠第8周至第14周的单胎分娩数据。在数据验证后,创建每个完整妊娠周的百分位数,通过二次函数平滑,分析并与机构和国家更常用的表格进行比较,使用z分数,百分位数比较,样本第10百分位检测敏感性和出生体重均值比较。结果:本组共出生新生儿5378例;纳入新生儿2195例(42%),出生时间为妊娠24 ~ 42周,统计时间为妊娠34 ~ 41周。每个胎龄的平均出生体重、参考文献之间、样本之间以及性别之间都存在差异。一些参考文献的第10百分位数显示,与样本值相比,37周时为-288g (Lubchenco等人的数据为-11%),34周时为+133g (Carrascosa等人的数据为+ 7.6%)。根据所使用的参考资料,鉴定低于第10百分位的样本出生体重的敏感性也存在差异,在14.1到100%之间。讨论:必须记住并尽量减少这些参考值的局限性,采用区域或国家生产的参考资料,考虑到其他变量,如性别,具有精确已知的妊娠期,并对所使用的参考资料进行就地验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, ISSN 1806-9339) is a monthly publication of scientific divulgation of the Federação das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO). It is directed to obstetricians, gynecologists and professionals of related areas, with the purpose of publishing research results on relevant topics in the field of Gynecology, Obstetrics and related areas. It is open to national and international contributions and the journal receives submissions only in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信