Chapter 6: Subspecies as a Meaningful Taxonomic Rank in Avian Classification

J. V. Remsen
{"title":"Chapter 6: Subspecies as a Meaningful Taxonomic Rank in Avian Classification","authors":"J. V. Remsen","doi":"10.1525/OM.2010.67.1.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Dissatisfaction with the subspecies unit of classification is, in part, a consequence of the failure of many of those who have described subspecies to follow the conceptual definition of the subspecies, namely that it should represent diagnosable units. The antiquity of the descriptions of most subspecies (median year of description of currently recognized subspecies estimated to be 1908–1909) means that the majority predated any statistical tools for assessing diagnosability. The traditional subspecies concept, as originally construed, identifies minimum diagnosable units as terminal taxa, and I suggest that it is thus essentially synonymous with the phylogenetic species concept. Therefore, both must deal with the fundamental difficulties inherent in using diagnosability as a criterion. Application of monophyly as a criterion for taxon rank at the population level has inherent difficulties. An advantage of the biological species concept is that it incorporates, in its classification of taxa, ass...","PeriodicalId":54665,"journal":{"name":"Ornithological Monographs","volume":"67 1","pages":"62-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/OM.2010.67.1.62","citationCount":"94","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/OM.2010.67.1.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 94

Abstract

Abstract Dissatisfaction with the subspecies unit of classification is, in part, a consequence of the failure of many of those who have described subspecies to follow the conceptual definition of the subspecies, namely that it should represent diagnosable units. The antiquity of the descriptions of most subspecies (median year of description of currently recognized subspecies estimated to be 1908–1909) means that the majority predated any statistical tools for assessing diagnosability. The traditional subspecies concept, as originally construed, identifies minimum diagnosable units as terminal taxa, and I suggest that it is thus essentially synonymous with the phylogenetic species concept. Therefore, both must deal with the fundamental difficulties inherent in using diagnosability as a criterion. Application of monophyly as a criterion for taxon rank at the population level has inherent difficulties. An advantage of the biological species concept is that it incorporates, in its classification of taxa, ass...
第六章:亚种在鸟类分类中的意义
对亚种分类单位的不满,部分是由于许多描述亚种的人未能遵循亚种的概念定义,即它应该代表可诊断的单位。大多数亚种描述的年代久远(目前已确认的亚种描述的中位数年代估计为1908-1909年)意味着,大多数描述早于评估可诊断性的任何统计工具。传统的亚种概念,正如最初解释的那样,将最小可诊断单位确定为终端分类群,因此我认为它本质上与系统发育物种概念同义。因此,两者都必须处理使用可诊断性作为标准所固有的基本困难。在种群水平上将单系性作为分类单元等级的标准存在固有的困难。生物物种概念的一个优点是,它在分类群的分类中纳入了生物物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信