Interrater reliability of subacromial ultrasound measures in the hands of novice sonographers.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Danish medical journal Pub Date : 2023-10-06
Karen Mikkelsen, Adam Witten, Per Hölmich Møller, Kristoffer W Barfod, Birgitte Hougs Kjær
{"title":"Interrater reliability of subacromial ultrasound measures in the hands of novice sonographers.","authors":"Karen Mikkelsen,&nbsp;Adam Witten,&nbsp;Per Hölmich Møller,&nbsp;Kristoffer W Barfod,&nbsp;Birgitte Hougs Kjær","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound measures of subacromial structures are reliable in the hands of experienced sonographers, but it remains unknown if inexperienced clinicians can achieve a satisfactory level of interrater reliability. The aim was to investigate if standardised subacromial ultrasound measures are reliable in the hands of novice sonographers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two novice sonographers performed standardised ultrasound measures on patients diagnosed with subacromial pain syndrome and asymptomatic shoulders. The measures were: supraspinatus tendon thickness (SUPRA), subacromial bursa thickness (SASD), acromio-humeral distance (AHD) and dynamic impingement (DI). Reliability and agreement were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC (2.1)), standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, 95% limits of agreement, Bland-Altman plots and Cohen's unweighted κ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight patients were recruited (28 symptomatic and 20 asymptomatic shoulders). The ICC of SUPRA ranged from 0.73 to 0.77. The ICC of SASD ranged from 0.41 to 0.88 and AHD from 0.68 to 0.72. Cohen's κ of DI in symptomatic shoulders was 0.29.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The interrater reliability of novice sonographers was found to be moderate to good when assessing SUPRA and AHD. For SASD and DI, the reliability ranged from poor to good. No significant differences in SUPRA and SASD thickness were found between symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"70 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound measures of subacromial structures are reliable in the hands of experienced sonographers, but it remains unknown if inexperienced clinicians can achieve a satisfactory level of interrater reliability. The aim was to investigate if standardised subacromial ultrasound measures are reliable in the hands of novice sonographers.

Methods: Two novice sonographers performed standardised ultrasound measures on patients diagnosed with subacromial pain syndrome and asymptomatic shoulders. The measures were: supraspinatus tendon thickness (SUPRA), subacromial bursa thickness (SASD), acromio-humeral distance (AHD) and dynamic impingement (DI). Reliability and agreement were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC (2.1)), standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, 95% limits of agreement, Bland-Altman plots and Cohen's unweighted κ.

Results: Twenty-eight patients were recruited (28 symptomatic and 20 asymptomatic shoulders). The ICC of SUPRA ranged from 0.73 to 0.77. The ICC of SASD ranged from 0.41 to 0.88 and AHD from 0.68 to 0.72. Cohen's κ of DI in symptomatic shoulders was 0.29.

Conclusion: The interrater reliability of novice sonographers was found to be moderate to good when assessing SUPRA and AHD. For SASD and DI, the reliability ranged from poor to good. No significant differences in SUPRA and SASD thickness were found between symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders.

Funding: None.

Trial registration: Not relevant.

新手超声医师手中肩峰下超声测量的询问者可靠性。
引言:在经验丰富的超声医师手中,肩峰下结构的超声测量是可靠的,但缺乏经验的临床医生能否达到令人满意的患者间可靠性水平仍不得而知。目的是调查标准化的肩峰下超声测量在新手超声医师手中是否可靠。方法:两名新手超声医师对诊断为肩峰下疼痛综合征和无症状肩部的患者进行标准化超声测量。测量指标为:冈上肌腱厚度(SUPRA)、肩峰下囊厚度(SASD)、肩肱距离(AHD)和动态冲击(DI)。通过组内相关系数(ICC(2.1))、测量标准误差、最小可检测变化、95%一致性极限、Bland-Altman图和Cohen未加权κ来评估可靠性和一致性。结果:招募了28名患者(28名有症状肩部和20名无症状肩部)。SUPRA的ICC在0.73到0.77之间。SASD的ICC在0.41至0.88之间,AHD在0.68至0.72之间。症状性肩关节DI的Cohenκ为0.29。结论:在评估SUPRA和AHD时,新手超声医师的患者间可靠性为中等至良好。对于SASD和DI,可靠性从差到好不等。在有症状和无症状的肩部之间,SUPRA和SASD厚度没有发现显著差异。资助:无。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信