Biomarkers that Can Predict the Diagnosis of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury on MR Images, Preoperatively.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
F Soy, O Pehlivan, B Oktaş, M Çirpar
{"title":"Biomarkers that Can Predict the Diagnosis of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury on MR Images, Preoperatively.","authors":"F Soy,&nbsp;O Pehlivan,&nbsp;B Oktaş,&nbsp;M Çirpar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The competence of the anterior translation of tibia (ATT), posterior cruciate ligament angle (PCLA), and femorotibial rotation angle (FTRA) measured on MR images in predicting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury was evaluated in this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS 266 patients who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy between 2015-2020 were included in this study. Age, gender, radiological fi ndings included ATT, PCLA, and FTRA were measured on preoperative MR images of all patients. RESULTS ACL tear was detected in 143 of patients and most of them were younger males. In ACL-R group, the ATT was 7 mm (-4-17 mm), PCLA value was 110º (52º-157º), and FTRA value was 5.8º (-5º-18º), while in ACL-I group, the ATT was approximately 5 mm (-4-12 mm), PCLA value was 122º (82º-162º) and FTRA value was 1.6º (-10.9º-10º) (p<0.001). ROCCurve test results showed that if ATT value was >6.05 mm (63% sensitivity, 65% specifi city) if PCLA value was <116.5º (65% sensitivity, 70% specifi city) and if FTRA value was >3.45º (73% sensitivity, 72% specifi city), these parameters could predict the probability of ACL tear, preoperatively. The Logistic Regression test results revealed that the PCLA and FTRA values could be the best markers to predict the probability of ACL tear, preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS This study results showed that the ATT, PCLA, and FTRA values could be used as predictive markers in diagnosis of ACL tear, preoperatively. Among these three values, it was concluded that the FTRA could have the highest sensitivity and specifi city ratios and the best predictive value. Key words: anterior cruciate ligament tear, magnetic resonance imaging, arthroscopy, rotational instability, femorotibial rotation angle, anterior translation of the tibia, posterior cruciate ligament angle.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"90 5","pages":"347-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The competence of the anterior translation of tibia (ATT), posterior cruciate ligament angle (PCLA), and femorotibial rotation angle (FTRA) measured on MR images in predicting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury was evaluated in this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS 266 patients who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy between 2015-2020 were included in this study. Age, gender, radiological fi ndings included ATT, PCLA, and FTRA were measured on preoperative MR images of all patients. RESULTS ACL tear was detected in 143 of patients and most of them were younger males. In ACL-R group, the ATT was 7 mm (-4-17 mm), PCLA value was 110º (52º-157º), and FTRA value was 5.8º (-5º-18º), while in ACL-I group, the ATT was approximately 5 mm (-4-12 mm), PCLA value was 122º (82º-162º) and FTRA value was 1.6º (-10.9º-10º) (p<0.001). ROCCurve test results showed that if ATT value was >6.05 mm (63% sensitivity, 65% specifi city) if PCLA value was <116.5º (65% sensitivity, 70% specifi city) and if FTRA value was >3.45º (73% sensitivity, 72% specifi city), these parameters could predict the probability of ACL tear, preoperatively. The Logistic Regression test results revealed that the PCLA and FTRA values could be the best markers to predict the probability of ACL tear, preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS This study results showed that the ATT, PCLA, and FTRA values could be used as predictive markers in diagnosis of ACL tear, preoperatively. Among these three values, it was concluded that the FTRA could have the highest sensitivity and specifi city ratios and the best predictive value. Key words: anterior cruciate ligament tear, magnetic resonance imaging, arthroscopy, rotational instability, femorotibial rotation angle, anterior translation of the tibia, posterior cruciate ligament angle.

术前磁共振图像上可预测前交叉韧带损伤诊断的生物标志物。
本研究评估了MR图像上测量的胫骨前移(ATT)、后交叉韧带角(PCLA)和股骨-胫骨旋转角(FTRA)预测前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的能力。材料和方法本研究纳入了2015-2020年间接受诊断性关节镜检查的266名患者。在所有患者的术前MR图像上测量年龄、性别、放射学结果,包括ATT、PCLA和FTRA。结果143例患者出现前交叉韧带撕裂,其中大部分为年轻男性。在ACL-R组中,ATT为7mm(4-17mm),PCLA值为110º(52º-157º),FTRA值为5.8º(-5º-18º),而在ACL-I组中,如果PCLA值是3.45º(73%灵敏度,72%特异性),则ATT约为5mm(4-12mm),PCL值为122º(82º-162º),并且FTRA值是1.6º(-10.9º-10º)(p6.05 mm(63%灵敏度,65%特异性),这些参数可以预测术前ACL撕裂的概率。Logistic回归测试结果显示,术前PCLA和FTRA值可能是预测ACL撕裂概率的最佳指标。结论本研究结果表明,ATT、PCLA和FTRA值可作为ACL撕裂术前诊断的预测指标。在这三个值中,FTRA可以具有最高的灵敏度和特异性比率以及最佳的预测值。关键词:前交叉韧带撕裂,磁共振成像,关节镜,旋转不稳定,股骨-胫骨旋转角度,胫骨前平移,后交叉韧带角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信