Does extent of sustainability reporting influence financial performance Evidence from five Asian economies

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
P. Goel, Rupali Misra
{"title":"Does extent of sustainability reporting influence financial performance Evidence from five Asian economies","authors":"P. Goel, Rupali Misra","doi":"10.1504/IJEWE.2020.10035455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainability reporting is a framework of comprehensive reporting of social and environment performance along with financial disclosures. According to KPMG (2017) survey, Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI) is considered the most inclusive framework for reporting sustainable practices by the firms. The primary objective of this paper is to assess and compare extent and informativeness of sustainability reports per GRI-G4 guidelines of five Asian economies (India, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore and Philippines). Using specific standard disclosures related to six different aspects of sustainability reporting as per GRI-G4 indicators, this study examines the relationship between sustainability reporting and financial performance of the selected companies. Over all, it has been observed that though sustainability reporting is gaining its ground, the extent of reporting as per GRI-G4 guidelines is low in all economies and there is a significant difference in reporting by selected countries. The study neither finds any significant impact of sustainability reporting on ROS and ROA, nor does financial performance significantly predict informativeness of sustainability reporting on different GRI-G4 indicators. The policy implication that the study recommends is to make sustainability reporting mandatory by law with penalty clause to make it more effective and comprehensive.","PeriodicalId":35410,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWE.2020.10035455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Sustainability reporting is a framework of comprehensive reporting of social and environment performance along with financial disclosures. According to KPMG (2017) survey, Global Reporting Initiatives (GRI) is considered the most inclusive framework for reporting sustainable practices by the firms. The primary objective of this paper is to assess and compare extent and informativeness of sustainability reports per GRI-G4 guidelines of five Asian economies (India, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore and Philippines). Using specific standard disclosures related to six different aspects of sustainability reporting as per GRI-G4 indicators, this study examines the relationship between sustainability reporting and financial performance of the selected companies. Over all, it has been observed that though sustainability reporting is gaining its ground, the extent of reporting as per GRI-G4 guidelines is low in all economies and there is a significant difference in reporting by selected countries. The study neither finds any significant impact of sustainability reporting on ROS and ROA, nor does financial performance significantly predict informativeness of sustainability reporting on different GRI-G4 indicators. The policy implication that the study recommends is to make sustainability reporting mandatory by law with penalty clause to make it more effective and comprehensive.
可持续发展报告的程度是否影响财务绩效?来自五个亚洲经济体的证据
可持续发展报告是一个全面报告社会和环境绩效以及财务披露的框架。根据毕马威(2017)的调查,全球报告倡议(GRI)被认为是公司报告可持续实践的最具包容性的框架。本文的主要目的是评估和比较五个亚洲经济体(印度、日本、香港、新加坡和菲律宾)按照GRI-G4指南编制的可持续发展报告的程度和信息量。根据GRI-G4指标,使用与可持续发展报告的六个不同方面相关的具体标准披露,本研究检验了所选公司可持续发展报告与财务绩效之间的关系。总的来说,我们观察到,尽管可持续发展报告正在取得进展,但在所有经济体中,按照GRI-G4指南进行报告的程度都很低,而且选定国家在报告方面存在显著差异。研究没有发现可持续发展报告对ROS和ROA的显著影响,财务绩效也没有显著预测可持续发展报告在不同GRI-G4指标上的信息量。该研究建议的政策含义是将可持续发展报告纳入强制性法律,并附带处罚条款,使其更加有效和全面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment
International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment Business, Management and Accounting-Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: IJEWM is a refereed reference and authoritative source of information in the field of environmental and waste management Together with its sister publications IJEP, IJETM and IJGEnvI, it provides a comprehensive coverage of environmental issues. It covers both engineering/technical and management solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信