{"title":"John Krosbein’s Commentary on the pseudo-Aristotelian De plantis: A Critical Edition","authors":"M. Panarelli","doi":"10.1484/j.bpm.5.118703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"John Krosbein is thought to have been active in the second half of fourteenth century and as such his commentary on De plantis is an isolated case, which lengthens the Pseudo-Aristotelian text's re...","PeriodicalId":35962,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de Philosophie Medievale","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de Philosophie Medievale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1484/j.bpm.5.118703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
John Krosbein is thought to have been active in the second half of fourteenth century and as such his commentary on De plantis is an isolated case, which lengthens the Pseudo-Aristotelian text's re...