From «the Loaf of Bread» to «Commodity-Fetishism»: a ‘New Interpretation’ of the Marx-Sraffa connection

Q2 Arts and Humanities

History of Economic Ideas Pub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI:10.1400/140329

S. Perri

引用次数: 8

Abstract

Sraffa’s unpublished papers have attracted again the attention of different scholars on the relationship between Marx’s and Sraffa’s economic theories. In his notes, as far as the theory of value is concerned, Sraffa states that the «delicate point» is the analysis of the relation between the wage rate and the rate of profit when wages partecipate in the distribution of surplus. Sraffa establishes a bridge among the ‘macro’ conception of a given surplus to be divided between the different social classes and the ‘micro’ analysis of the prices of the different commodities by equalizing the value of the net product to the labour employed in its production. From this perspective Sraffa’s analysis can be linked to the ‘New Interpretation’ approach to the transformation of values into prices of production.

查看原文本刊更多论文

从“面包”到“商品拜物教”:马克思—斯拉法关系的“新诠释”

斯拉法未发表的论文再次引起了不同学者对马克思与斯拉法经济理论关系的关注。在他的笔记中，就价值理论而言，斯拉法指出，当工资参与剩余分配时，“微妙点”是对工资率和利润率之间关系的分析。斯拉法通过将净产品的价值与生产中所使用的劳动价值相等，在给定剩余在不同社会阶层之间分配的“宏观”概念和不同商品价格的“微观”分析之间建立了一座桥梁。从这个角度来看，斯拉法的分析可以与将价值转化为生产价格的“新解释”方法联系起来。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

History of Economic Ideas Arts and Humanities-History

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： History of Economic Ideas is a new international series of Quaderni di storia dell''economia politica, a journal founded in 1983 to promote collaboration between scholars who share an historical approach to the major issues, the various "revolutions" which have left their mark on economics and the spread of economic ideas beyond the narrow circle of specialists. History of Economic Ideas rejects the dichotomy between "analysis" and "culture": both aspects are of equal importance for a wider understanding of the subject. In a period such as our own, where paradigms which once seemed unshakeable are now being challenged, a multidisciplinary analysis of the historical development of economics might contribute to shedding light on the issues at the root of current debate. Besides essays and critical surveys, the journal includes archive material and reviews of new books on history of economics. History of Economic Ideas is double-blind peer reviewed.