Reviewing Media Literacy Intervention Studies for Validity

IF 6.3 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Review of Communication Research Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.018

W. Potter, C. Thai

引用次数: 15

Abstract

This study is an examination of validity in published articles that have provided tests of the effectiveness of media literacy interventions. We identified 88 published tests of media literacy interventions then analyzed their content using five coding variables that indicated the degree to which authors of those studies established basic validity. We first conducted a meaning analysis to identify the definitions that authors of those studies presented for media literacy. Then we used those definitions to determine the extent to which those authors provided a complete (content validity) and accurate (face validity) operationalization in the design of their measures.

查看原文本刊更多论文

媒介素养干预研究的效度回顾

本研究是对已发表文章的有效性进行检验，这些文章提供了媒体素养干预措施有效性的测试。我们确定了88个已发表的媒体素养干预测试，然后使用五个编码变量分析了它们的内容，这些变量表明了这些研究的作者建立基本效度的程度。我们首先进行了意义分析，以确定这些研究的作者对媒体素养的定义。然后，我们使用这些定义来确定这些作者在其测量设计中提供完整(内容效度)和准确(面效度)操作化的程度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Review of Communication Research COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： Review of Communication Research will publish an annual volume with comprehensive and authoritative reviews of the current state of the main topics and the most significant developments in the field of Communication. These comprehensive critical reviews will summarize the latest advances in the field, but also will root out errors and will provoke intellectual discussions among scholars. The journal seeks both evaluative (theorical) and quantitative (meta-analysis) papers that make a state of the art of issues in scientific communication. Integrative review articles that connect different areas of research are of special interest.