Local politicians in action? The relationship between perceived prerequisites and actions of political committees responsible for social services in supporting the implementation of evidence-based practice

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
A. Bäck, U. V. T. Schwarz, Anna Bergström, H. Hasson, A. Richter
{"title":"Local politicians in action? The relationship between perceived prerequisites and actions of political committees responsible for social services in supporting the implementation of evidence-based practice","authors":"A. Bäck, U. V. T. Schwarz, Anna Bergström, H. Hasson, A. Richter","doi":"10.1332/174426421X16178101375342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A supportive context is essential for successful implementation processes. Local politicians are delivery system actors who might both enable and hinder the implementation of health and social policies. Aims and objectives: The study examines the relationship between perceived prerequisites and the type of actions taken by local political committees to support the implementation of evidence-based practice in social services. Methods: A cross-sectional web survey targeting the chair and vice-chair of committees responsible for social services in Sweden (n=181). The data was analysed with regression analysis, cluster analysis and ANOVA. Findings: Three clusters of action were identified (passive, neutral and active), capturing the reported actions taken by the committees to support implementation of EBP. The committees’ perceived prerequisites (capability, motivation, and opportunity) were highest in the active cluster and lowest in the passive cluster. The clusters also differed regarding chair/vice-chair educational level, and type of municipality in which the chair/vice-chair were active. Discussions and conclusion: The variation in reported actions among the committees to support the implementation of EBP implies that some social service organisations might lack the contextual support they need for implementing EBP. The prerequisites for the committees might need to be strengthened with regard to capability, motivation and opportunity. This study is an indication of the relationship between committees’ prerequisites and their actions in the implementation of EBP, but further research is needed.Key messagesThis study contributes to the literature on the contextual factors that may facilitate local politicians’ actions regarding the implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP).The reported actions taken by the political committees to support the implementation of EBP varied greatly.Strengthening the prerequisites of political committees should not only encompass capability, but also motivation and opportunity.","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16178101375342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A supportive context is essential for successful implementation processes. Local politicians are delivery system actors who might both enable and hinder the implementation of health and social policies. Aims and objectives: The study examines the relationship between perceived prerequisites and the type of actions taken by local political committees to support the implementation of evidence-based practice in social services. Methods: A cross-sectional web survey targeting the chair and vice-chair of committees responsible for social services in Sweden (n=181). The data was analysed with regression analysis, cluster analysis and ANOVA. Findings: Three clusters of action were identified (passive, neutral and active), capturing the reported actions taken by the committees to support implementation of EBP. The committees’ perceived prerequisites (capability, motivation, and opportunity) were highest in the active cluster and lowest in the passive cluster. The clusters also differed regarding chair/vice-chair educational level, and type of municipality in which the chair/vice-chair were active. Discussions and conclusion: The variation in reported actions among the committees to support the implementation of EBP implies that some social service organisations might lack the contextual support they need for implementing EBP. The prerequisites for the committees might need to be strengthened with regard to capability, motivation and opportunity. This study is an indication of the relationship between committees’ prerequisites and their actions in the implementation of EBP, but further research is needed.Key messagesThis study contributes to the literature on the contextual factors that may facilitate local politicians’ actions regarding the implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP).The reported actions taken by the political committees to support the implementation of EBP varied greatly.Strengthening the prerequisites of political committees should not only encompass capability, but also motivation and opportunity.
地方政客在行动?感知的先决条件与负责社会服务的政治委员会在支持实施循证实践方面的行动之间的关系
背景:支持性环境对成功的实施过程至关重要。地方政治家是执行系统的行为者,他们可能促进也可能阻碍卫生和社会政策的实施。目的和目标:本研究考察了感知到的先决条件与地方政治委员会为支持在社会服务中实施循证实践而采取的行动类型之间的关系。方法:针对瑞典负责社会服务的委员会的主席和副主席进行横断面网络调查(n=181)。采用回归分析、聚类分析和方差分析对数据进行分析。结果:确定了三组行动(被动,中立和主动),捕获了委员会为支持实施EBP而采取的报告行动。委员会感知到的先决条件(能力、动机和机会)在主动集群中最高,在被动集群中最低。这些集群在主席/副主席的教育水平和主席/副主席活跃的城市类型方面也存在差异。讨论与结论:报告中委员会支持实施EBP的行动的差异意味着一些社会服务组织可能缺乏实施EBP所需的背景支持。在能力、积极性和机会方面,可能需要加强委员会的先决条件。本研究表明了委员会在实施EBP时的先决条件与其行动之间的关系,但还需要进一步的研究。本研究对可能促进地方政治家在实施循证实践(EBP)方面采取行动的背景因素的文献做出了贡献。据报道,各政治委员会为支持实施EBP而采取的行动差别很大。加强政治委员会的先决条件不仅包括能力,还包括动力和机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信