The stakes in francophone health promotion research

L. Fond-Harmant
{"title":"The stakes in francophone health promotion research","authors":"L. Fond-Harmant","doi":"10.1177/1025382308094372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"to develop research programmes. They wish to build their own evaluation and development competencies, adapted to local needs and based on their own agendas. North–South partnerships exist, but they require delicate intercultural approaches (3) and are often subordinate to industrial countries’ agendas. The articles put together in this supplement of Promotion & Education constitute the follow-up to the discussions raised during the francophone international conference entitled ‘Health Promotion and Health Education: State of Knowledge and Research Needs’, which took place in Luxembourg on 8–9 February 2007 (4). This collective publication is self-explanatory. It contributes to francophone scientific dynamics by favouring shared knowledge and an openness to different realities and perspectives. As with the conference itself, this supplement aims to question ‘health promotion and health education’ research and action carried out in different countries, and to identify their successes, failures and limitations. Anglophone researchers (5) have shown, in literature reviews between 1995 and 2005, that health promotion research production varies across Europe. Northern European countries and the United Kingdom are the largest knowledge producers. From the 18,862 publications identified, only onethird are dedicated to health promotion, which corresponds to 6,935 publications. As much as 28% of publications are on disease prevention (screening and immunization). The most frequent topics of other publications are nutrition and","PeriodicalId":79366,"journal":{"name":"Promotion & education","volume":"15 1","pages":"85 - 86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1025382308094372","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Promotion & education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1025382308094372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

to develop research programmes. They wish to build their own evaluation and development competencies, adapted to local needs and based on their own agendas. North–South partnerships exist, but they require delicate intercultural approaches (3) and are often subordinate to industrial countries’ agendas. The articles put together in this supplement of Promotion & Education constitute the follow-up to the discussions raised during the francophone international conference entitled ‘Health Promotion and Health Education: State of Knowledge and Research Needs’, which took place in Luxembourg on 8–9 February 2007 (4). This collective publication is self-explanatory. It contributes to francophone scientific dynamics by favouring shared knowledge and an openness to different realities and perspectives. As with the conference itself, this supplement aims to question ‘health promotion and health education’ research and action carried out in different countries, and to identify their successes, failures and limitations. Anglophone researchers (5) have shown, in literature reviews between 1995 and 2005, that health promotion research production varies across Europe. Northern European countries and the United Kingdom are the largest knowledge producers. From the 18,862 publications identified, only onethird are dedicated to health promotion, which corresponds to 6,935 publications. As much as 28% of publications are on disease prevention (screening and immunization). The most frequent topics of other publications are nutrition and
法语国家健康促进研究的利害关系
发展研究计划。他们希望建立自己的评价和发展能力,适应当地的需要并根据自己的议程。南北伙伴关系是存在的,但它们需要微妙的跨文化方法(3),而且往往服从于工业国家的议程。《促进与教育》增刊中的文章是对2007年2月8日至9日在卢森堡举行的法语国际会议"促进健康与健康教育:知识现状和研究需求"期间提出的讨论的后续行动(4)。这份集体出版物是不言自明的。它通过支持共享知识和对不同现实和观点的开放态度,促进了法语国家的科学动态。与会议本身一样,本增刊旨在质疑在不同国家开展的“健康促进和健康教育”研究和行动,并确定其成功、失败和局限性。在1995年至2005年的文献综述中,以英语为母语的研究人员(5)表明,欧洲各地的健康促进研究成果各不相同。北欧国家和英国是最大的知识生产者。在已查明的18 862份出版物中,只有三分之一专门用于促进健康,相当于6 935份出版物。多达28%的出版物是关于疾病预防(筛查和免疫)的。其他出版物中最常见的主题是营养和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信