Fungibility in the Academia

Q1 Social Sciences
I. L. Tian
{"title":"Fungibility in the Academia","authors":"I. L. Tian","doi":"10.1177/2347631119840537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this position article, we tackle fungibility, precariousness and separateness in the academia. Speaking as young humanities and social sciences scholar in North America, we argue that the current neoliberal conditions in higher education can be understood as alienation from work in the Marxian sense. Hence, the kind of intervention that challenges the fungibility has to be anti-alienation. Based on our collective organizing, we would delineate and call for a collective turn in terms of how new academics organize themselves and produce knowledge. Indeed, this piece should be read as a collective manifesto rather than a once and for all solution to profound problems in higher education. The true ‘for the people’ higher education needs to be constructed around collectivism and sustainable knowledge production.","PeriodicalId":36834,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education for the Future","volume":"6 1","pages":"158 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2347631119840537","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education for the Future","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631119840537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this position article, we tackle fungibility, precariousness and separateness in the academia. Speaking as young humanities and social sciences scholar in North America, we argue that the current neoliberal conditions in higher education can be understood as alienation from work in the Marxian sense. Hence, the kind of intervention that challenges the fungibility has to be anti-alienation. Based on our collective organizing, we would delineate and call for a collective turn in terms of how new academics organize themselves and produce knowledge. Indeed, this piece should be read as a collective manifesto rather than a once and for all solution to profound problems in higher education. The true ‘for the people’ higher education needs to be constructed around collectivism and sustainable knowledge production.
学术界的可替代性
在这篇立场文章中,我们讨论了学术界的可替代性、不稳定性和分离性。作为北美年轻的人文和社会科学学者,我们认为,当前高等教育中的新自由主义状况可以理解为马克思意义上的工作异化。因此,挑战可替代性的干预必须是反异化的。在我们的集体组织的基础上,我们将描绘并呼吁在新学者如何组织自己和产生知识方面的集体转向。的确,这篇文章应该被解读为一份集体宣言,而不是对高等教育中深刻问题的一劳永逸的解决方案。真正的“为人民”的高等教育需要围绕集体主义和可持续的知识生产来构建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Higher Education for the Future
Higher Education for the Future Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信