The Online Battlefield: How Conflict Frames in Political Advertisements Affect Political Participation in a Multiparty Context

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Emma van der Goot, S. Kruikemeier, R. Vliegenthart, J. de Ridder
{"title":"The Online Battlefield: How Conflict Frames in Political Advertisements Affect Political Participation in a Multiparty Context","authors":"Emma van der Goot, S. Kruikemeier, R. Vliegenthart, J. de Ridder","doi":"10.1177/00323217231178105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how politicians’ conflict framing strategies in online campaign advertisements affect citizens’ political participation in a multi-party context. We rely on a unique combination of innovative research methods to do so, including a four-wave panel survey, a content analysis of Facebook browser-tracking data and a mobile experience sampling survey with data donations. All data were collected during the 2021 Dutch general elections. We find that conflict framing can discourage citizens from engaging in low-effort forms of political participation, such as discussing politics, signing a petition and visiting political websites. The results show that conflict frames can demobilize citizens because they lower enthusiasm and are perceived as less informative. Our study provides insights into the potential unintended consequences of using conflict framing as a campaign strategy in a multi-party setting.","PeriodicalId":51379,"journal":{"name":"Political Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231178105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines how politicians’ conflict framing strategies in online campaign advertisements affect citizens’ political participation in a multi-party context. We rely on a unique combination of innovative research methods to do so, including a four-wave panel survey, a content analysis of Facebook browser-tracking data and a mobile experience sampling survey with data donations. All data were collected during the 2021 Dutch general elections. We find that conflict framing can discourage citizens from engaging in low-effort forms of political participation, such as discussing politics, signing a petition and visiting political websites. The results show that conflict frames can demobilize citizens because they lower enthusiasm and are perceived as less informative. Our study provides insights into the potential unintended consequences of using conflict framing as a campaign strategy in a multi-party setting.
在线战场:政治广告中的冲突框架如何影响多方背景下的政治参与
本文探讨了在多党制背景下,政治家在网络竞选广告中的冲突框架策略如何影响公民的政治参与。我们依靠创新研究方法的独特组合来做到这一点,包括四波面板调查,Facebook浏览器跟踪数据的内容分析以及数据捐赠的移动体验抽样调查。所有数据均在2021年荷兰大选期间收集。我们发现,冲突框架会阻碍公民参与低努力的政治参与形式,如讨论政治、签署请愿书和访问政治网站。结果表明,冲突框架可以使公民复员,因为它们降低了积极性,并被认为提供的信息较少。我们的研究为在多方环境下使用冲突框架作为竞选策略的潜在意想不到的后果提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Political Studies
Political Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Political Studies is a leading international journal committed to the very highest standards of peer review that publishes academically rigorous and original work in all fields of politics and international relations. The editors encourage a pluralistic approach to political science and debate across the discipline. Political Studies aims to develop the most promising new work available and to facilitate professional communication in political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信