The WTO Cathedral

IF 1 4区社会学

Stanford Journal of International Law Pub Date : 2007-01-01 DOI:10.1142/9789814635721_0013

J. Trachtman

引用次数: 30

Abstract

The only universal consequence of a legally binding promise is that the law makes the promisor pay damages if the promised event does not come to pass. According to conventional wisdom, it is a waste of time and money for developing countries to invoke the WTO's dispute settlement procedure against industrial countries.

查看原文本刊更多论文

世贸组织大教堂

具有法律约束力的承诺的唯一普遍后果是，如果承诺的事件没有发生，法律要求承诺人支付损害赔偿。按照传统观念，发展中国家对发达国家诉诸世贸组织争端解决程序是浪费时间和金钱。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Stanford Journal of International Law Multiple-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1966, the Stanford Journal of International Law is one of the oldest and most reputable international law journals in the United States. Publishing two regular issues each year, the journal seeks to promote scholarship of the highest quality through timely, innovative, and important pieces on international and comparative legal topics. The journal invites contributions from professors, practitioners, legislators, judges, and Stanford Law School students.