Crystalloids versus colloids: the end of an old debate?: CRYSTALLOIDS VERSUS COLLOIDS

J. Boldt
{"title":"Crystalloids versus colloids: the end of an old debate?: CRYSTALLOIDS VERSUS COLLOIDS","authors":"J. Boldt","doi":"10.1111/J.1778-428X.2010.01139.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY \n \nThe ‘ideal’ plasma substitute for volume replacement remains a matter of dispute. Merits and demerits of colloids versus crystalloids for volume replacement have been discussed very emotionally. Are we any wiser concerning the crystalloid/colloid problem? Recently published meta-analyses or evidence-based medicine analyses appear to be less helpful to solve this problem. Conflicting results from different studies are most likely as a result of variations in clinical protocols, selection of patients, criteria for blood or volume administration. With their conflicting results more questions arise than answers are given.","PeriodicalId":90375,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","volume":"11 1","pages":"118-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2010.01139.X","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion alternatives in transfusion medicine : TATM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1778-428X.2010.01139.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

SUMMARY The ‘ideal’ plasma substitute for volume replacement remains a matter of dispute. Merits and demerits of colloids versus crystalloids for volume replacement have been discussed very emotionally. Are we any wiser concerning the crystalloid/colloid problem? Recently published meta-analyses or evidence-based medicine analyses appear to be less helpful to solve this problem. Conflicting results from different studies are most likely as a result of variations in clinical protocols, selection of patients, criteria for blood or volume administration. With their conflicting results more questions arise than answers are given.
晶体与胶体:一场古老辩论的终结?晶体与胶体
体积置换的“理想”血浆替代品仍然是一个有争议的问题。在体积替代方面,胶体和晶体的优缺点已经讨论得非常热烈。关于晶体/胶体问题,我们有什么更明智的办法吗?最近发表的荟萃分析或循证医学分析似乎对解决这个问题没有多大帮助。来自不同研究的相互矛盾的结果很可能是由于临床方案、患者选择、血液或体积给药标准的差异。由于他们相互矛盾的结果,产生的问题比给出的答案更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信