Decision-making process of knowledge push service to improve organizational performance and efficiency: developing knowledge push algorithm

IF 2.7 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Rubel Rubel, B. Kushwaha, Md Helal Miah
{"title":"Decision-making process of knowledge push service to improve organizational performance and efficiency: developing knowledge push algorithm","authors":"Rubel Rubel, B. Kushwaha, Md Helal Miah","doi":"10.1108/vjikms-08-2022-0280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to highlight the inconsistency between conventional knowledge push judgements and the price of knowledge push. Also, a three-way decision-based relevant knowledge push algorithm was proposed.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing a ratio of 80–20%, the experiment randomly splits the data into a training set and a test set. Each video is used as a knowledge unit (structure) in the research, and the category is used as a knowledge attribute. The limit is then determined using the user’s overall rating. To calculate the pertinent information obtained through experiments, the fusion coefficient is needed. The impact of the push model is then examined in comparison to the conventional push model. In the experiment, relevant knowledge is compared using three push models, two push models based on conventional International classification functioning (ICF), and three push models based on traditional ICF. The average push cost accuracy rate, recall rate and coverage rate are metrics used to assess the push effect.\n\n\nFindings\nThe three-way knowledge push models perform better on average than the other push models in this research in terms of push cost, accuracy rate and recall rate. However, the three-way knowledge push models suggested in this study have a lower coverage rate than the two-way push model. So three-way knowledge push models condense the knowledge push and forfeit a particular coverage rate. As a result, improving knowledge results in higher accuracy rates and lower push costs.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis research has practical ramifications for the quick expansion of knowledge and its hegemonic status in value creation as the main methodology for knowledge services.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first theory developed on the three-way decision-making process of knowledge push services to increase organizational effectiveness and efficiency.\n","PeriodicalId":45590,"journal":{"name":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","volume":"85 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-08-2022-0280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to highlight the inconsistency between conventional knowledge push judgements and the price of knowledge push. Also, a three-way decision-based relevant knowledge push algorithm was proposed. Design/methodology/approach Using a ratio of 80–20%, the experiment randomly splits the data into a training set and a test set. Each video is used as a knowledge unit (structure) in the research, and the category is used as a knowledge attribute. The limit is then determined using the user’s overall rating. To calculate the pertinent information obtained through experiments, the fusion coefficient is needed. The impact of the push model is then examined in comparison to the conventional push model. In the experiment, relevant knowledge is compared using three push models, two push models based on conventional International classification functioning (ICF), and three push models based on traditional ICF. The average push cost accuracy rate, recall rate and coverage rate are metrics used to assess the push effect. Findings The three-way knowledge push models perform better on average than the other push models in this research in terms of push cost, accuracy rate and recall rate. However, the three-way knowledge push models suggested in this study have a lower coverage rate than the two-way push model. So three-way knowledge push models condense the knowledge push and forfeit a particular coverage rate. As a result, improving knowledge results in higher accuracy rates and lower push costs. Practical implications This research has practical ramifications for the quick expansion of knowledge and its hegemonic status in value creation as the main methodology for knowledge services. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first theory developed on the three-way decision-making process of knowledge push services to increase organizational effectiveness and efficiency.
提高组织绩效和效率的知识推送服务决策过程:知识推送算法的开发
目的研究传统知识推送判断与知识推送价格之间的不一致性。提出了一种基于三向决策的相关知识推送算法。设计/方法/方法实验采用80-20%的比例,将数据随机分为训练集和测试集。在研究中,将每个视频作为一个知识单元(结构),将类别作为一个知识属性。然后使用用户的总体评分来确定限制。为了计算实验得到的相关信息,需要计算聚变系数。然后将推模型的影响与传统推模型进行比较。在实验中,使用三种推送模型、基于常规国际分类功能(ICF)的两种推送模型和基于传统ICF的三种推送模型对相关知识进行了比较。平均推送成本、准确率、召回率和覆盖率是评估推送效果的指标。结果三向知识推送模型在推送成本、准确率和召回率方面均优于其他三向知识推送模型。然而,本研究提出的三向知识推送模型的覆盖率低于双向知识推送模型。因此,三向知识推送模型压缩了知识推送,并丧失了特定的覆盖率。因此,知识的提高会带来更高的准确率和更低的推送成本。本研究对知识的快速扩张及其作为知识服务的主要方法论在价值创造中的霸主地位具有现实意义。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一个关于知识推动服务提高组织有效性和效率的三方决策过程的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信