Unethical Issues in Twenty-First Century International Development and Global Health Policy

IF 1.8 1区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Jessi Hanson-DeFusco, Sakil Malik, R. Assamoi, Antony Chiromba, Decontee Davis, Fidèle Marc Hounnouvi, F. Irfan, Patrick Faley, Djo Dieudonne Matangwa, Tambu Muzenda, Hanifa Nakiryowa, Andiwo Obondoh, S. Parveen, Ana Julia Pinales, Rugare Zimunya
{"title":"Unethical Issues in Twenty-First Century International Development and Global Health Policy","authors":"Jessi Hanson-DeFusco, Sakil Malik, R. Assamoi, Antony Chiromba, Decontee Davis, Fidèle Marc Hounnouvi, F. Irfan, Patrick Faley, Djo Dieudonne Matangwa, Tambu Muzenda, Hanifa Nakiryowa, Andiwo Obondoh, S. Parveen, Ana Julia Pinales, Rugare Zimunya","doi":"10.1093/isp/ekad016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Billions in development aid is provided annually by international donors in the Majority World, much of which funds health equity. Yet, common neocolonial practices persist in development that compromise what is done in the name of well-intentioned policymaking and programming. Based on a qualitative analysis of fifteen case studies presented at a 2022 conference, this research examines trends involving unethical partnerships, policies, and practices in contemporary global health. The analysis identifies major modern-day issues of harmful policy and programming in international aid. Core issues include inequitable partnerships between and representation of international stakeholders and national actors, abuse of staff and unequal treatment, and new forms of microaggressive practices by Minority World entities on low-/middle-income nations (LMICs), made vulnerable by severe poverty and instability. When present, these issues often exacerbate institutionalized discrimination, hostile work environments, ethnocentrism, and poor sustainability in development. These unbalanced systems perpetuate a negative development culture and can place those willing to speak out at risk. At a time when the world faces increased threats including global warming and new health crises, development and global health policy and practice must evolve through inclusive dialogue and collaborative effort.","PeriodicalId":47002,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Perspectives","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekad016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Billions in development aid is provided annually by international donors in the Majority World, much of which funds health equity. Yet, common neocolonial practices persist in development that compromise what is done in the name of well-intentioned policymaking and programming. Based on a qualitative analysis of fifteen case studies presented at a 2022 conference, this research examines trends involving unethical partnerships, policies, and practices in contemporary global health. The analysis identifies major modern-day issues of harmful policy and programming in international aid. Core issues include inequitable partnerships between and representation of international stakeholders and national actors, abuse of staff and unequal treatment, and new forms of microaggressive practices by Minority World entities on low-/middle-income nations (LMICs), made vulnerable by severe poverty and instability. When present, these issues often exacerbate institutionalized discrimination, hostile work environments, ethnocentrism, and poor sustainability in development. These unbalanced systems perpetuate a negative development culture and can place those willing to speak out at risk. At a time when the world faces increased threats including global warming and new health crises, development and global health policy and practice must evolve through inclusive dialogue and collaborative effort.
21世纪国际发展和全球卫生政策中的不道德问题
多数世界的国际捐助者每年提供数十亿美元的发展援助,其中大部分用于卫生公平。然而,普遍的新殖民主义做法在发展中持续存在,这些做法损害了以善意的政策制定和规划的名义所做的事情。在对2022年会议上提出的15个案例研究进行定性分析的基础上,本研究审查了当代全球卫生中涉及不道德伙伴关系、政策和做法的趋势。该分析指出了当今国际援助中有害政策和规划的主要问题。核心问题包括国际利益攸关方和国家行为体之间不公平的伙伴关系和代表权,工作人员滥用和不平等待遇,以及少数民族世界实体对中低收入国家(LMICs)新形式的微侵略行为,这些国家因严重贫困和不稳定而变得脆弱。当这些问题出现时,往往会加剧制度化的歧视、敌对的工作环境、种族中心主义和发展的可持续性差。这些不平衡的系统使消极的发展文化永久化,并将那些愿意直言不讳的人置于危险之中。在世界面临越来越多的威胁,包括全球变暖和新的卫生危机之际,发展和全球卫生政策和做法必须通过包容性对话和协作努力不断发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Studies Perspectives
International Studies Perspectives INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: International Studies Perspectives (ISP) publishes peer-reviewed articles that bridge the interests of researchers, teachers, and practitioners working within any and all subfields of international studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信