Secondary victimization and the collective identity of crime victims: a qualitative analysis of Swedish crime news discourse

R. Lundström
{"title":"Secondary victimization and the collective identity of crime victims: a qualitative analysis of Swedish crime news discourse","authors":"R. Lundström","doi":"10.1080/14043858.2016.1161941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents an analysis of how secondary victims of murder—in this context, the parents or close family members of a primary murder victim—are represented in Swedish crime news discourse. The study is based on a discourse analysis of media coverage of secondary victims, and statements made by them, in relation to four highly publicized murder cases during the last two decades. The analysis shows that portrayals of secondary victimization reinforce the conflictual character of victim–offender relationships in the news, but also limit the conditions for talking about the significance of social support, mediation and reconciliation for crime victims. News representations of crime victims become less clearly marked by the characteristics of the ‘ideal’ victim as secondary victims, and persons who are explicitly critical toward the legal system, claim victimhood. Furthermore, the identity of the crime victims’ movement as a collective becomes destabilized when the category of the victim is widened to include individuals whose interests are framed as subjective, rather than related to the needs of other crime victims or the general public. In sum, increased media focus on secondary victims may thus undermine the legitimacy of victim claims in public discourse.","PeriodicalId":88919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention","volume":"17 1","pages":"36 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14043858.2016.1161941","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2016.1161941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This article presents an analysis of how secondary victims of murder—in this context, the parents or close family members of a primary murder victim—are represented in Swedish crime news discourse. The study is based on a discourse analysis of media coverage of secondary victims, and statements made by them, in relation to four highly publicized murder cases during the last two decades. The analysis shows that portrayals of secondary victimization reinforce the conflictual character of victim–offender relationships in the news, but also limit the conditions for talking about the significance of social support, mediation and reconciliation for crime victims. News representations of crime victims become less clearly marked by the characteristics of the ‘ideal’ victim as secondary victims, and persons who are explicitly critical toward the legal system, claim victimhood. Furthermore, the identity of the crime victims’ movement as a collective becomes destabilized when the category of the victim is widened to include individuals whose interests are framed as subjective, rather than related to the needs of other crime victims or the general public. In sum, increased media focus on secondary victims may thus undermine the legitimacy of victim claims in public discourse.
二次受害与犯罪受害者的集体认同:瑞典犯罪新闻话语的定性分析
本文分析了在瑞典犯罪新闻话语中,谋杀的次要受害者——在这种情况下,主要谋杀受害者的父母或亲密家庭成员——是如何被代表的。这项研究是基于对媒体报道的二次受害者的话语分析,以及他们在过去二十年中与四起高度公开的谋杀案有关的陈述。分析表明,新闻对二次受害的刻画强化了犯罪受害者与罪犯关系的冲突特征,但也限制了社会支持、调解与和解对犯罪受害者意义的讨论条件。新闻对犯罪受害者的描述变得不那么清晰,“理想”受害者的特征被标记为次要受害者,而那些明确批评法律制度的人则声称自己是受害者。此外,当受害者的类别扩大到包括其利益被设定为主观的个人,而不是与其他犯罪受害者或一般公众的需要有关时,犯罪受害者运动作为一个集体的身份就会变得不稳定。总而言之,媒体对次要受害者的更多关注可能因此破坏受害者在公共话语中主张的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信