No teacher left behind: Valuing teacher voice in elementary reading teacher education reform

A. Broemmel
{"title":"No teacher left behind: Valuing teacher voice in elementary reading teacher education reform","authors":"A. Broemmel","doi":"10.1080/19388070609558460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Elementary teachers have long been absent from the debates surrounding teacher education reform. This research aimed to provide an avenue for teachers to share their insights and beliefs about teacher education. A two‐tiered selection produced a sample of over two‐hundred elementary teachers for this study. They were asked to compare their own reading teacher education to that of the student teachers with whom they worked. Most indicated that reading teacher education had changed little since they received their undergraduate degrees, but regardless of their overall evaluation, two items emerged as the basis of that decision: coursework and field experiences.","PeriodicalId":88664,"journal":{"name":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","volume":"46 1","pages":"53 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388070609558460","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading research and instruction : the journal of the College Reading Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070609558460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract Elementary teachers have long been absent from the debates surrounding teacher education reform. This research aimed to provide an avenue for teachers to share their insights and beliefs about teacher education. A two‐tiered selection produced a sample of over two‐hundred elementary teachers for this study. They were asked to compare their own reading teacher education to that of the student teachers with whom they worked. Most indicated that reading teacher education had changed little since they received their undergraduate degrees, but regardless of their overall evaluation, two items emerged as the basis of that decision: coursework and field experiences.
不让一个教师掉队:重视小学阅读教师教育改革中的教师声音
长期以来,小学教师一直缺席围绕教师教育改革的争论。本研究旨在为教师提供一个分享他们对教师教育的见解和信念的途径。本研究采用两层选择,选取了200多名小学教师作为样本。他们被要求将自己的阅读教师教育与与他们一起工作的学生教师的教育进行比较。大多数人表示,自从他们获得本科学位以来,阅读教师教育几乎没有变化,但不管他们的总体评估如何,有两个项目成为了他们做出决定的基础:课程作业和实地经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信