Disproportionate Minority Contact in the American Juvenile Justice System: Where are We after 20 Years, a Philosophy Shift, and Three Amendments?

Susan A. McCarter
{"title":"Disproportionate Minority Contact in the American Juvenile Justice System: Where are We after 20 Years, a Philosophy Shift, and Three Amendments?","authors":"Susan A. McCarter","doi":"10.1080/1936928X.2011.541217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the past 20 years, youth of color have been overrepresented in the American juvenile justice system. Over that same period, the philosophy of the juvenile court has changed from a more informal and rehabilitative model to a more formal and punitive model, and minority youth have experienced disparate and more severe outcomes than their majority counterparts. Starting in 1988, 3 significant policy changes were made via amendments to the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 mandating that states address disproportionate minority contact (DMC). The author examined the philosophy shifts in juvenile justice, as well as systemic and DMC policy changes, and their effects on the current status of minority overrepresentation. Recommendations are presented for social workers to address disproportionate minority contact.","PeriodicalId":89974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic social work","volume":"1 1","pages":"107 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1936928X.2011.541217","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2011.541217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

For the past 20 years, youth of color have been overrepresented in the American juvenile justice system. Over that same period, the philosophy of the juvenile court has changed from a more informal and rehabilitative model to a more formal and punitive model, and minority youth have experienced disparate and more severe outcomes than their majority counterparts. Starting in 1988, 3 significant policy changes were made via amendments to the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 mandating that states address disproportionate minority contact (DMC). The author examined the philosophy shifts in juvenile justice, as well as systemic and DMC policy changes, and their effects on the current status of minority overrepresentation. Recommendations are presented for social workers to address disproportionate minority contact.
美国少年司法系统中少数族裔接触比例过高:20年后我们在哪里,哲学转变,三次修正案?
在过去的20年里,美国少年司法系统中有色人种的青少年比例过高。在同一时期,少年法庭的理念已经从一种更非正式和康复的模式转变为一种更正式和惩罚性的模式,少数民族青年经历了与大多数同龄人不同的更严重的后果。从1988年开始,通过对1974年《少年司法和犯罪预防法案》的修订,美国做出了三项重大政策变化,要求各州解决不成比例的少数族裔接触(DMC)问题。作者考察了少年司法的理念转变,以及系统和DMC政策的变化,以及它们对少数民族代表性过高现状的影响。建议社会工作者解决不成比例的少数民族接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信