“Tooting One's Horn” and Lauding One's Fellow in the Construction of a History of Anthropological Theory

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY

Reviews in Anthropology Pub Date : 2014-07-01 DOI:10.1080/00938157.2014.937665

Richard Pace

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The notion of lobbying for a place in the history of anthropological theory is used to frame the importance of the autobiography, collected works, Festschrift essays, and biography reviewed here. Ranging from bottom-up historicism, behavioral paleoanthropology, and French structural Marxism to historical particularism, the books by or about Stocking, Freeman, Godelier, and Mead emphasize the contributions of each while staking out a new or extended intellectual territory or status in the fluid (re)writing of the theoretical history of the discipline.

查看原文本刊更多论文

人类学理论史建构中的“自吹自擂”与“同道称赞”

游说在人类学理论史上占有一席之地的概念被用来框定自传、文集、费斯契夫随笔和传记的重要性。从自下而上的历史决论、行为古人类学、法国结构马克思主义到历史特殊主义，斯托金、弗里曼、戈德利耶和米德撰写的或关于他们的书强调了各自的贡献，同时在学科理论史的流动(重新)写作中指出了一个新的或扩展的知识领域或地位。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Reviews in Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Reviews in Anthropology is the only anthropological journal devoted to lengthy, in-depth review commentary on recently published books. Titles are largely drawn from the professional literature of anthropology, covering the entire range of work inclusive of all sub-disciplines, including biological, cultural, archaeological, and linguistic anthropology; a smaller number of books is selected from related disciplines. Articles evaluate the place of new books in their theoretical and topical literatures, assess their contributions to anthropology as a whole, and appraise the current state of knowledge in the field. The highly diverse subject matter sustains both specialized research and the generalist tradition of holistic anthropology.