How Does Safety Stack Up? A Survey of Corporate Financial Decision Makers' Perceptions of Safety Performance, Programs And Personnel

S. DeArmond, Yueng-hsiang Huang, Peter Y. Chen
{"title":"How Does Safety Stack Up? A Survey of Corporate Financial Decision Makers' Perceptions of Safety Performance, Programs And Personnel","authors":"S. DeArmond, Yueng-hsiang Huang, Peter Y. Chen","doi":"10.1037/e518442013-332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Top-levelmanagers makeimportant decisionsabout safety-relatedissues, yet little safetyresearch has beendone involving theseindividuals. SH&E pro-fessionals must workwith these managersto access valuedresources, so under-standing their per-ceptions anddecision-makingprocesses is critical.This study involved asurvey of corporatefinancial decisionmakers to gathertheir opinions regard-ing their companies’safety performance,programs and person-nel, as well as thereasoning behindthese opinions. Theobjective was to iden-tify ways to improveoccupational safetyand offer ideas forways SH&E profes-sionals might moreeasily access resourcesfor safety. Summary of Responses How does your company compare to other companies in your industry?Question Not as good The same BetterSafety performance 22 (5.8%) 108 (28.3%) 251 (65.9%)Safety programs 14 (3.8%) 145 (39.7%) 206 (56.4%)Safety personnel 14 (4.0%) 163 (46.6%) 173 (49.4%) Table 1 Table 1 28_DeArmond_Mar2007.qxp 2/12/2007 9:58 AM Page 29","PeriodicalId":74579,"journal":{"name":"Professional safety","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e518442013-332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract: Top-levelmanagers makeimportant decisionsabout safety-relatedissues, yet little safetyresearch has beendone involving theseindividuals. SH&E pro-fessionals must workwith these managersto access valuedresources, so under-standing their per-ceptions anddecision-makingprocesses is critical.This study involved asurvey of corporatefinancial decisionmakers to gathertheir opinions regard-ing their companies’safety performance,programs and person-nel, as well as thereasoning behindthese opinions. Theobjective was to iden-tify ways to improveoccupational safetyand offer ideas forways SH&E profes-sionals might moreeasily access resourcesfor safety. Summary of Responses How does your company compare to other companies in your industry?Question Not as good The same BetterSafety performance 22 (5.8%) 108 (28.3%) 251 (65.9%)Safety programs 14 (3.8%) 145 (39.7%) 206 (56.4%)Safety personnel 14 (4.0%) 163 (46.6%) 173 (49.4%) Table 1 Table 1 28_DeArmond_Mar2007.qxp 2/12/2007 9:58 AM Page 29
安全性如何累积?公司财务决策者对安全绩效、计划和人员的看法的调查
摘要:高层管理人员对安全相关问题做出重要决策,但涉及这些人的安全研究却很少。SH&E专业人员必须与这些管理人员合作,以获取有价值的资源,因此了解他们的看法和决策过程至关重要。这项研究包括对公司财务决策者进行调查,收集他们对公司安全绩效、计划和人员的意见,以及这些意见背后的原因。目的是确定改善职业安全的方法,并为职业安全与卫生专业人员提供更容易获得安全资源的方法。与同行业的其他公司相比,贵公司如何?问题不太好同样更好安全性能22(5.8%)108(28.3%)251(65.9%)安全方案14(3.8%)145(39.7%)206(56.4%)安全人员14(4.0%)163(46.6%)173(49.4%)表1qxp 2/12/2007 9:58 AM 29页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信