Valutazione dell’efficacia di due dispositivi monouso per l’igiene orale

M. Migliario , F. Giarda , M. Mosca , L. Rimondini
{"title":"Valutazione dell’efficacia di due dispositivi monouso per l’igiene orale","authors":"M. Migliario ,&nbsp;F. Giarda ,&nbsp;M. Mosca ,&nbsp;L. Rimondini","doi":"10.1016/j.pad.2011.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness of two disposable devices for personal dental hygiene.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Experimental, randomized, controlled study of a sample of young healthy adults. The subjects were randomly assigned to a test or a control group. The former subjects used the disposable dental hygiene devices (a low-density polyethylene toothbrush and a polyurethane sponge swab), and the controls used their own traditional toothbrushes. Two calibrated operators calculated the plaque index as described by Dababneh (NMPS) and the gingival index using the Löe and Silness method (GI), at the beginning of the study (T0) and after 48<!--> <!-->hours (T1).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with controls, the test group presented a significant increase in the plaque index at T1 among the users of disposable devices, that was smaller in those who used the toothbrush (tooth brush p-value ≤0.002 vs sponge swab p-value ≤0.001), in comparison with the control group (one-way ANOVA).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of a disposable toothbrush is better than using a disposable sponge swab.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77593,"journal":{"name":"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale","volume":"37 3","pages":"Pages 97-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pad.2011.06.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0393996011000680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of two disposable devices for personal dental hygiene.

Materials and methods

Experimental, randomized, controlled study of a sample of young healthy adults. The subjects were randomly assigned to a test or a control group. The former subjects used the disposable dental hygiene devices (a low-density polyethylene toothbrush and a polyurethane sponge swab), and the controls used their own traditional toothbrushes. Two calibrated operators calculated the plaque index as described by Dababneh (NMPS) and the gingival index using the Löe and Silness method (GI), at the beginning of the study (T0) and after 48 hours (T1).

Results

Compared with controls, the test group presented a significant increase in the plaque index at T1 among the users of disposable devices, that was smaller in those who used the toothbrush (tooth brush p-value ≤0.002 vs sponge swab p-value ≤0.001), in comparison with the control group (one-way ANOVA).

Conclusions

The use of a disposable toothbrush is better than using a disposable sponge swab.

评估两种一次性口腔卫生设备的有效性
目的评价两种一次性口腔卫生器械的使用效果。材料与方法以健康青年为样本进行实验、随机、对照研究。研究对象被随机分配到试验组和对照组。前一组使用一次性牙齿卫生设备(低密度聚乙烯牙刷和聚氨酯海绵拭子),对照组使用他们自己的传统牙刷。在研究开始时(T0)和48小时后(T1),两名校准的操作员使用Löe和Silness法(GI)计算Dababneh (NMPS)描述的菌斑指数和牙龈指数。结果与对照组相比,试验组在T1时使用一次性器械者的菌斑指数显著增加,而使用牙刷者(牙刷p值≤0.002 vs海绵拭子p值≤0.001)的菌斑指数低于对照组(单因素方差分析)。结论使用一次性牙刷优于使用一次性海绵拭子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信