Valutazione clinica comparativa fra due collutori agli oli essenziali con e senza alcol

M. Basso, J. Nowakowska, G. Bordini, S. Corbella
{"title":"Valutazione clinica comparativa fra due collutori agli oli essenziali con e senza alcol","authors":"M. Basso,&nbsp;J. Nowakowska,&nbsp;G. Bordini,&nbsp;S. Corbella","doi":"10.1016/j.pad.2010.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Essential oils have been used for years as components of mouthwashes. Although their antiseptic potency is inferior to that of chlorhexidine, they can be used daily as an adjunct to daily oral hygiene and as a treatment for halitosis. The aim of this prospective, double-blind, comparative study was to evaluate the efficacy of two mouthwashes containing essential oils, one without alcohol and the other containing 22% alcohol. Of the 31 patients enrolled, 28 completed the protocol, which consisted in two 15-day cycles (one for each product tested) of twice-a-day rinses.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Full Mouth Bleeding Scores (FMBS%), Full Mouth Plaque Scores (FMPS%) and Stain Indexes (SI) were recorded. Patients also filled in a questionnaire regarding their personal reactions to each mouthwash.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The two products were equally effective in reducing oral hygiene indexes. The use of the mouthwash containing alcohol was associated with an increased sensation of “burning”.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite the similar antiplaque activities of these products, the risk/benefit ratio of daily use of mouthwashes containing alcohol (sometimes at high concentrations) must be examined according to recent scientific evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77593,"journal":{"name":"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale","volume":"37 2","pages":"Pages 57-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pad.2010.10.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevenzione & assistenza dentale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0393996011000023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Essential oils have been used for years as components of mouthwashes. Although their antiseptic potency is inferior to that of chlorhexidine, they can be used daily as an adjunct to daily oral hygiene and as a treatment for halitosis. The aim of this prospective, double-blind, comparative study was to evaluate the efficacy of two mouthwashes containing essential oils, one without alcohol and the other containing 22% alcohol. Of the 31 patients enrolled, 28 completed the protocol, which consisted in two 15-day cycles (one for each product tested) of twice-a-day rinses.

Materials and methods

Full Mouth Bleeding Scores (FMBS%), Full Mouth Plaque Scores (FMPS%) and Stain Indexes (SI) were recorded. Patients also filled in a questionnaire regarding their personal reactions to each mouthwash.

Results

The two products were equally effective in reducing oral hygiene indexes. The use of the mouthwash containing alcohol was associated with an increased sensation of “burning”.

Conclusions

Despite the similar antiplaque activities of these products, the risk/benefit ratio of daily use of mouthwashes containing alcohol (sometimes at high concentrations) must be examined according to recent scientific evidence.

两种含酒精和不含酒精的精油漱口剂的比较临床评价
精油作为漱口水的成分已经使用了很多年。虽然它们的杀菌效力不如氯己定,但它们可以作为日常口腔卫生的辅助品和治疗口臭。这项前瞻性、双盲、比较研究的目的是评估两种含精油漱口水的功效,一种不含酒精,另一种含22%酒精。在入选的31名患者中,28名完成了该方案,该方案包括两个15天的周期(每种测试产品一个周期),每天两次冲洗。材料与方法记录全口出血评分(FMBS%)、全口菌斑评分(FMPS%)和染色指数(SI)。患者还填写了一份关于他们对每种漱口水的个人反应的调查问卷。结果两种产品对降低口腔卫生指标的效果相同。使用含酒精的漱口水会增加“灼烧感”。结论:尽管这些产品具有相似的抗牙菌斑活性,但必须根据最近的科学证据对每天使用含酒精(有时是高浓度)漱口水的风险/收益比进行检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信