Best frenemies? A characterization of TNC and transit users

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Farzana Khatun, Jean-Daniel M. Saphores
{"title":"Best frenemies? A characterization of TNC and transit users","authors":"Farzana Khatun,&nbsp;Jean-Daniel M. Saphores","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The emergence of transportation network companies (TNCs) has created new options for travelers and fierce competition for taxis and public transportation (PT). While the literature focuses either on TNCs or PT users, we contrast individuals/households who use only PT, only TNCs, or both by estimating a cross-nested logit on 2017 NHTS data. We analyzed both individuals (for consistency with most of the literature) and households (to account for intrahousehold travel dependencies). Our results show that the unit of analysis (individuals vs. households) does not matter much for our dataset. We found that individuals/households who use either PT or TNCs or both share socio-economic characteristics, reside in similar areas, and differ from individuals/households who use neither transit nor TNCs. In addition, individuals/households who use both PT and TNCs tend to be composed of Millennials and Generation Z, with a higher income, more education, no children, and fewer vehicles than drivers. Our findings highlight the danger for PT of entering into outsourcing agreements with TNCs, neglecting captive riders, and further exposing choice riders to TNCs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Transportation","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100029"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000297/pdfft?md5=57a962a58261a42c1e8580daeaa83df9&pid=1-s2.0-S1077291X22000297-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077291X22000297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of transportation network companies (TNCs) has created new options for travelers and fierce competition for taxis and public transportation (PT). While the literature focuses either on TNCs or PT users, we contrast individuals/households who use only PT, only TNCs, or both by estimating a cross-nested logit on 2017 NHTS data. We analyzed both individuals (for consistency with most of the literature) and households (to account for intrahousehold travel dependencies). Our results show that the unit of analysis (individuals vs. households) does not matter much for our dataset. We found that individuals/households who use either PT or TNCs or both share socio-economic characteristics, reside in similar areas, and differ from individuals/households who use neither transit nor TNCs. In addition, individuals/households who use both PT and TNCs tend to be composed of Millennials and Generation Z, with a higher income, more education, no children, and fewer vehicles than drivers. Our findings highlight the danger for PT of entering into outsourcing agreements with TNCs, neglecting captive riders, and further exposing choice riders to TNCs.

最好的友敌?跨国公司和过境用户的特征
交通网络公司(TNCs)的出现为旅行者创造了新的选择,也为出租车和公共交通(PT)带来了激烈的竞争。虽然文献关注的是跨国公司或PT用户,但我们通过估计2017年NHTS数据的交叉嵌套逻辑,对仅使用PT、仅使用跨国公司或两者都使用的个人/家庭进行了对比。我们分析了个人(与大多数文献一致)和家庭(考虑家庭内部旅行依赖)。我们的结果表明,分析单位(个人与家庭)对我们的数据集来说并不重要。我们发现,使用公交或跨国公司的个人/家庭或两者都具有社会经济特征,居住在相似的地区,与既不使用公交也不使用跨国公司的个人/家庭不同。此外,同时使用PT和跨国公司的个人/家庭往往由千禧一代和Z一代组成,他们收入更高,受教育程度更高,没有孩子,车辆比司机少。我们的研究结果强调了PT与跨国公司签订外包协议的危险,忽视了强制性附加条款,并进一步将选择性附加条款暴露给跨国公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Transportation, affiliated with the Center for Urban Transportation Research, is an international peer-reviewed open access journal focused on various forms of public transportation. It publishes original research from diverse academic disciplines, including engineering, economics, planning, and policy, emphasizing innovative solutions to transportation challenges. Content covers mobility services available to the general public, such as line-based services and shared fleets, offering insights beneficial to passengers, agencies, service providers, and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信