Prevalence of asymptomatic malaria and associated factors among pregnant women in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2023-10-11 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2023.1258952
Tadesse Duguma, Eyob Tekalign, Samuel Sahile Kebede, Getachew Mesfin Bambo
{"title":"Prevalence of asymptomatic malaria and associated factors among pregnant women in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tadesse Duguma, Eyob Tekalign, Samuel Sahile Kebede, Getachew Mesfin Bambo","doi":"10.3389/frph.2023.1258952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The proactive identification of asymptomatic patients and the mitigation of associated problems are essential to the elimination of malaria. For asymptomatic malaria and related variables among pregnant women in Ethiopia, there are no national pooled estimates. As a result, the goal of this study is to compile thorough and compelling data from several Ethiopian investigations. Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopes, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and African Journals Online were a few of the electronic resources that were accessed. The investigation included all observational studies. STATA version 15 was used to extract the data from the Microsoft Excel file and conduct the analysis. The estimated pooled prevalence of asymptomatic malaria among pregnant women was calculated using a random-effects model. An inverse variance index (I<sup>2</sup>) analysis was utilized to find heterogeneity. To assess the publication bias, funnel plots, and Egger's statistical tests were used. The study determined that the combined prevalence of asymptomatic malaria among pregnant women was 7.20 (95% confidence interval = 4.22, 10.18) and 4.69 (95% confidence interval = 2.77, 6.62) by microscopy and rapid diagnostic test, respectively. The presence of stagnant water near their home (odds ratio = 4.31; 95% confidence interval = 1.66, 11.20); not using insecticide-treated nets (odds ratio = 6.93; 95% confidence interval = 3.27, 14.71); the lack of indoor residual spray service (odds ratio = 2.68; 95% confidence interval = 1.63, 4.40); and the presence of pregnant women in their neighborhood (odds ratio = 3.14; 95% confidence interval = 1.4). This study showed that pregnant women have a high pooled prevalence of asymptomatic malaria. Women living in rural areas near stagnant water and those who never used insecticide-treated nets had a two-, four-, or six-fold higher prevalence of asymptomatic malaria, respectively. The use of advanced diagnostic techniques could produce a higher magnitude of the disease. For effective intervention toward elimination, active case detection at the community level is also advised.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023411385; identifier, CRD42023411385.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1258952"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1258952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proactive identification of asymptomatic patients and the mitigation of associated problems are essential to the elimination of malaria. For asymptomatic malaria and related variables among pregnant women in Ethiopia, there are no national pooled estimates. As a result, the goal of this study is to compile thorough and compelling data from several Ethiopian investigations. Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopes, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and African Journals Online were a few of the electronic resources that were accessed. The investigation included all observational studies. STATA version 15 was used to extract the data from the Microsoft Excel file and conduct the analysis. The estimated pooled prevalence of asymptomatic malaria among pregnant women was calculated using a random-effects model. An inverse variance index (I2) analysis was utilized to find heterogeneity. To assess the publication bias, funnel plots, and Egger's statistical tests were used. The study determined that the combined prevalence of asymptomatic malaria among pregnant women was 7.20 (95% confidence interval = 4.22, 10.18) and 4.69 (95% confidence interval = 2.77, 6.62) by microscopy and rapid diagnostic test, respectively. The presence of stagnant water near their home (odds ratio = 4.31; 95% confidence interval = 1.66, 11.20); not using insecticide-treated nets (odds ratio = 6.93; 95% confidence interval = 3.27, 14.71); the lack of indoor residual spray service (odds ratio = 2.68; 95% confidence interval = 1.63, 4.40); and the presence of pregnant women in their neighborhood (odds ratio = 3.14; 95% confidence interval = 1.4). This study showed that pregnant women have a high pooled prevalence of asymptomatic malaria. Women living in rural areas near stagnant water and those who never used insecticide-treated nets had a two-, four-, or six-fold higher prevalence of asymptomatic malaria, respectively. The use of advanced diagnostic techniques could produce a higher magnitude of the disease. For effective intervention toward elimination, active case detection at the community level is also advised.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023411385; identifier, CRD42023411385.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

埃塞俄比亚孕妇中无症状疟疾的患病率及相关因素:系统综述和荟萃分析。
积极识别无症状患者和缓解相关问题对消除疟疾至关重要。关于埃塞俄比亚孕妇中的无症状疟疾和相关变量,没有国家汇总估计数。因此,本研究的目标是汇编来自埃塞俄比亚几项调查的全面而令人信服的数据。Google Scholar、PubMed、Scopes、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和African Journals Online是访问的少数电子资源。调查包括所有观察性研究。STATA版本15用于从Microsoft Excel文件中提取数据并进行分析。使用随机效应模型计算孕妇中无症状疟疾的估计合并流行率。利用逆方差指数(I2)分析来发现异质性。为了评估发表偏倚,使用了漏斗图和艾格统计检验。研究确定,孕妇中无症状疟疾的综合患病率为7.20(95%置信区间 = 4.22、10.18)和4.69(95%置信区间 = 2.77,6.62)。他们家附近有死水(比值比 = 4.31;95%置信区间 = 1.66、11.20);未使用驱虫蚊帐(比值比 = 6.93;95%置信区间 = 3.27、14.71);缺乏室内残留喷洒服务(比值比 = 2.68;95%置信区间 = 1.63、4.40);以及附近是否有孕妇(比值比 = 3.14;95%置信区间 = 1.4)。这项研究表明,孕妇无症状疟疾的合并流行率很高。生活在靠近死水的农村地区的妇女和从未使用过驱虫蚊帐的妇女的无症状疟疾患病率分别高出两倍、四倍或六倍。使用先进的诊断技术可以产生更高程度的疾病。为了有效干预消除,还建议在社区层面积极检测病例。系统评审注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023411385;标识符,CRD42023411385。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信