Validez actual de la litotricia extracorpórea como tratamiento de primera línea de la litiasis

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
C. Mínguez Ojeda, I. Laso García, D. López Curtis, G. Duque Ruiz, M. Mata Alcaraz, M. Santiago González, A. Artiles Medina, M. Hevia Palacios, F. Arias Fúnez, F.J. Burgos Revilla
{"title":"Validez actual de la litotricia extracorpórea como tratamiento de primera línea de la litiasis","authors":"C. Mínguez Ojeda,&nbsp;I. Laso García,&nbsp;D. López Curtis,&nbsp;G. Duque Ruiz,&nbsp;M. Mata Alcaraz,&nbsp;M. Santiago González,&nbsp;A. Artiles Medina,&nbsp;M. Hevia Palacios,&nbsp;F. Arias Fúnez,&nbsp;F.J. Burgos Revilla","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2023.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5 mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.13; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.15; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.052) and number of waves (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002; OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.131; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000), number of waves (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.000; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000), energy (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.005; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.024, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004, OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.571).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"48 2","pages":"Pages 134-139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480623001249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones.

Methods

Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed.

Results

1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5 mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR = 1.13; P = 0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR = 1.15; P = 0.052) and number of waves (P = 0.002; OR = 1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR = 1.131; P = 0.000), number of waves (OR = 1.000; P = 0.000), energy (OR = 1.005; P = 0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (P = 0.024, OR = 1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (P = 0.004, OR = 0.571).

Conclusion

Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.

体外碎石作为尿路结石一线治疗方法的当前有效性
方法对2014年1月至2021年1月期间在一家三级中心接受体外碎石治疗的所有患者进行回顾性观察研究,回顾患者的特征、结石、并发症和体外碎石的结果。对结石缩小的相关因素进行了多变量逻辑回归。此外,还对SWL术后追加治疗的相关因素以及并发症的相关因素进行了统计分析。结石平均大小为 9.5 毫米。1540例(89.4%)患者的结石缩小。在多变量分析中,结石大小(OR = 1.13;P = 0.00)、碎石的输尿管位置(OR = 1.15;P = 0.052)和体外碎石术中使用的碎石波数(P = 0.002;OR = 1.00)是导致结石缩小的相关因素。有 665 名患者(38.5%)在碎石后需要再次治疗。结石大小(OR = 1.131;P = 0.000)、碎石波数(OR = 1.000;P = 0.000)、能量(OR = 1.005;P = 0.000)是需要再次治疗的相关因素。153名患者(8.8%)在SWL术后出现并发症。结论碎石术仍是治疗输尿管结石的一线疗法,且并发症发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Actas urologicas espanolas
Actas urologicas espanolas UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Actas Urológicas Españolas is an international journal dedicated to urological diseases and renal transplant. It has been the official publication of the Spanish Urology Association since 1974 and of the American Urology Confederation since 2008. Its articles cover all aspects related to urology. Actas Urológicas Españolas, governed by the peer review system (double blinded), is published online in Spanish and English. Consequently, manuscripts may be sent in Spanish or English and bidirectional free cost translation will be provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信