Jeremy E. Martin, Peggy Vincent
下载PDF
{"title":"New remains of Machimosaurus hugii von Meyer, 1837 (Crocodilia, Thalattosuchia) from the Kimmeridgian of Germany","authors":"Jeremy E. Martin, Peggy Vincent","doi":"10.1002/mmng.201300009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The fourth complete skull of the marine crocodilian <i>Machimosaurus</i> von Meyer, 1837 is hereby described together with an associated complete mandible and disarticulated postcranial elements from the Kimmeridgian of Neuffen, Germany. Although the genus has been described fairly recently on the basis of two nearly complete skulls, their state of preservation did not allow a thorough examination of the entire skull anatomy. Here, we add new information with the description of nicely preserved cranial and mandibular elements of a single individual attributable to <i>Machimosaurus hugii</i> von Meyer, 1837. The diagnosis is updated for the genus and for the species <i>M. hugii</i> and challenges the validity of the second species <i>M. mosae</i> (Liénard, 1876). Moreover, previous assumption that <i>Steneosaurus obtusidens</i> Andrews, 1913 is a junior synonym of <i>Machimosaurus hugii</i> is not supported by our observations. Notably, <i>M. hugii</i> differs from <i>S. obtusidens</i> by a lower tooth count, the morphology of the dentition, the shape of the supratemporal fenestrae and the absence of an antorbital fenestra. Comparative anatomy and a phylogenetic analysis show that <i>Machimosaurus</i> is more closely related to the genus <i>Steneosaurus</i> than to <i>Teleosaurus cadomensis</i> (Lamouroux, 1820). (© 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)</p>","PeriodicalId":55147,"journal":{"name":"Fossil Record","volume":"16 2","pages":"179-196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mmng.201300009","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fossil Record","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mmng.201300009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39
引用
批量引用
Abstract
The fourth complete skull of the marine crocodilian Machimosaurus von Meyer, 1837 is hereby described together with an associated complete mandible and disarticulated postcranial elements from the Kimmeridgian of Neuffen, Germany. Although the genus has been described fairly recently on the basis of two nearly complete skulls, their state of preservation did not allow a thorough examination of the entire skull anatomy. Here, we add new information with the description of nicely preserved cranial and mandibular elements of a single individual attributable to Machimosaurus hugii von Meyer, 1837. The diagnosis is updated for the genus and for the species M. hugii and challenges the validity of the second species M. mosae (Liénard, 1876). Moreover, previous assumption that Steneosaurus obtusidens Andrews, 1913 is a junior synonym of Machimosaurus hugii is not supported by our observations. Notably, M. hugii differs from S. obtusidens by a lower tooth count, the morphology of the dentition, the shape of the supratemporal fenestrae and the absence of an antorbital fenestra. Comparative anatomy and a phylogenetic analysis show that Machimosaurus is more closely related to the genus Steneosaurus than to Teleosaurus cadomensis (Lamouroux, 1820). (© 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
胡吉·冯·迈耶machmosaurus hugii von Meyer的新遗迹,1837(鳄鱼目,Thalattosuchia),德国基默里吉纪
本文描述了1837年的第四个完整的海洋鳄鱼马基摩龙头骨,以及来自德国Neuffen的Kimmeridgian的完整下颌骨和未连接的后颅骨。尽管最近在两个几乎完整的头骨的基础上对该属进行了描述,但它们的保存状态不允许对整个头骨解剖结构进行彻底检查。在这里,我们添加了新的信息,描述了保存完好的单一个体的头骨和下颌元素,可归因于hugii von Meyer, 1837。对该属和M. hugii种的诊断进行了更新,并对第二个种M. mosae的有效性提出了挑战(livendard, 1876)。此外,先前关于钝突龙(steeosaurus obtusidens Andrews, 1913)是hugii machmosaurus的低级同义种的假设也不符合我们的观察结果。值得注意的是,M. hugii不同于S. obtusidens在较低的牙齿数量,牙列的形态,颞上窗的形状和眶前窗的缺失。比较解剖学和系统发育分析表明,machmosaurus与teeosaurus属的关系比与telosaurus cadomensis的关系更近(Lamouroux, 1820)。(©2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &KGaA公司,Weinheim)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。