Characterising the stability of the organic matter during anaerobic digestion: a selective review on the major spectroscopic techniques

IF 8.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
David Fernández-Domínguez, Felipe Guilayn, Dominique Patureau, Julie Jimenez
{"title":"Characterising the stability of the organic matter during anaerobic digestion: a selective review on the major spectroscopic techniques","authors":"David Fernández-Domínguez,&nbsp;Felipe Guilayn,&nbsp;Dominique Patureau,&nbsp;Julie Jimenez","doi":"10.1007/s11157-022-09623-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Digestate landspreading is a key aspect of the circular economy. However, organic matter (OM) stability in digestates is usually either poorly assessed or done through laborious methods. Spectroscopic methods are useful and easy to deploy alternatives to assess several aspects in anaerobic digestion (AD) studies such as process performance, waste classification and both OM composition and transformation. In these studies, a lack of agreement on analytical techniques, indicators and reference values is evident. This unclear scenario brings to the forefront the need for a meta-analytical study providing benchmarking values and trends. This review aimed to fill up this gap through the identification and evaluation of: (i) the most frequently applied techniques, their principles, deployment methods and limitations, (ii) the quantitative spectroscopic indices to define OM stability, (iii) the common trends of these parameters due to AD effect on the OM and (iv) the relevance of each technique based on the frequency of statistically significant results reported. Ultraviolet–visible and fluorescence spectroscopy have been identified as the most relevant techniques for aqueous phase study whereas mid-infrared and <sup>13</sup>C cross-polarisation magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance were the most appropriate for the solid phase. Their most applied indicators and their trends after AD have been summarised. Finally, the research studies that displayed statistically significant findings were described, the representativeness of the indices and the influence of sample preparation on their calculation were discussed and future research lines were suggested. Overall, this review demonstrates that spectroscopic methods provide relevant information for better digestate management.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n <figure><div><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></div></figure>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":754,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology","volume":"21 3","pages":"691 - 726"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11157-022-09623-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Digestate landspreading is a key aspect of the circular economy. However, organic matter (OM) stability in digestates is usually either poorly assessed or done through laborious methods. Spectroscopic methods are useful and easy to deploy alternatives to assess several aspects in anaerobic digestion (AD) studies such as process performance, waste classification and both OM composition and transformation. In these studies, a lack of agreement on analytical techniques, indicators and reference values is evident. This unclear scenario brings to the forefront the need for a meta-analytical study providing benchmarking values and trends. This review aimed to fill up this gap through the identification and evaluation of: (i) the most frequently applied techniques, their principles, deployment methods and limitations, (ii) the quantitative spectroscopic indices to define OM stability, (iii) the common trends of these parameters due to AD effect on the OM and (iv) the relevance of each technique based on the frequency of statistically significant results reported. Ultraviolet–visible and fluorescence spectroscopy have been identified as the most relevant techniques for aqueous phase study whereas mid-infrared and 13C cross-polarisation magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance were the most appropriate for the solid phase. Their most applied indicators and their trends after AD have been summarised. Finally, the research studies that displayed statistically significant findings were described, the representativeness of the indices and the influence of sample preparation on their calculation were discussed and future research lines were suggested. Overall, this review demonstrates that spectroscopic methods provide relevant information for better digestate management.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

表征厌氧消化过程中有机物的稳定性:对主要光谱技术的选择性回顾
消化用地是循环经济的一个关键方面。然而,消化系统中有机物(OM)的稳定性通常要么评估不佳,要么通过费力的方法来完成。在厌氧消化(AD)研究中,光谱方法是有用且易于部署的替代方法,可用于评估几个方面,如过程性能,废物分类以及OM组成和转化。在这些研究中,对分析技术、指标和参考值显然缺乏一致意见。这种不明确的情况将提供基准价值和趋势的元分析研究带到最前沿。本综述旨在通过识别和评估来填补这一空白:(i)最常用的技术,它们的原理,部署方法和局限性,(ii)定义OM稳定性的定量光谱指标,(iii)由于AD对OM的影响,这些参数的共同趋势,以及(iv)基于统计显著结果报告频率的每种技术的相关性。紫外可见光谱和荧光光谱被认为是水相研究最相关的技术,而中红外和13C交叉极化魔角旋转核磁共振是最适合于固相研究的技术。总结了它们最常用的指标和AD后的趋势。最后,对统计结果显著的研究进行了描述,讨论了指标的代表性和样品制备对其计算的影响,并提出了未来的研究方向。总之,这篇综述表明光谱方法为更好的消化管理提供了相关信息。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Environmental Science-Waste Management and Disposal
CiteScore
25.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology is a publication that offers easily comprehensible, reliable, and well-rounded perspectives and evaluations in the realm of environmental science and (bio)technology. It disseminates the most recent progressions and timely compilations of groundbreaking scientific discoveries, technological advancements, practical applications, policy developments, and societal concerns encompassing all facets of environmental science and (bio)technology. Furthermore, it tackles broader aspects beyond the natural sciences, incorporating subjects such as education, funding, policy-making, intellectual property, and societal influence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信