Contradictions between and within school and university activity systems helping to explain students’ difficulty with advanced mathematics

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kamila Jooganah;Julian S. Williams
{"title":"Contradictions between and within school and university activity systems helping to explain students’ difficulty with advanced mathematics","authors":"Kamila Jooganah;Julian S. Williams","doi":"10.1093/teamat/hrw014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how contradictions, as framed by activity theory (Engeström, 1987), can explain first-year undergraduate students’ experiences of learning advanced mathematics. Analysing qualitative interview and observational data of students and lecturers based in one university mathematics department, we argue that contradictions between the school and university activity systems, as well as those within the latter, help explain some of the difficulties, including the conflict in cognition and identity, students can experience when they encounter advanced mathematics at university. This helps us to adopt a critical stance towards the systems students are expected to learn in, and points to system developments that might better support student learning.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/teamat/hrw014","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8237124/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This article explores how contradictions, as framed by activity theory (Engeström, 1987), can explain first-year undergraduate students’ experiences of learning advanced mathematics. Analysing qualitative interview and observational data of students and lecturers based in one university mathematics department, we argue that contradictions between the school and university activity systems, as well as those within the latter, help explain some of the difficulties, including the conflict in cognition and identity, students can experience when they encounter advanced mathematics at university. This helps us to adopt a critical stance towards the systems students are expected to learn in, and points to system developments that might better support student learning.
学校和大学活动系统之间和内部的矛盾有助于解释学生的高等数学困难
本文探讨了以活动理论(Engeström,1987)为框架的矛盾如何解释一年级本科生学习高等数学的经历。通过分析一所大学数学系学生和讲师的定性访谈和观察数据,我们认为学校和大学活动系统之间以及后者内部的矛盾有助于解释一些困难,包括认知和身份的冲突,学生们可以在大学里体验高等数学。这有助于我们对学生期望学习的系统采取批评态度,并指出系统开发可能会更好地支持学生学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信