Defining common criteria for harmonizing life cycle assessments of livestock systems

Pietro Goglio , Marie Trydeman Knudsen , Klara Van Mierlo , Nina Röhrig , Maxime Fossey , Alberto Maresca , Fatemeh Hashemi , Muhammad Ahmed Waqas , Jenny Yngvesson , Gilles Nassy , Roline Broekema , Simon Moakes , Catherine Pfeifer , Robert Borek , David Yanez-Ruiz , Monica Quevedo Cascante , Alina Syp , Tomasz Zylowsky , Manuel Romero-Huelva , Laurence G. Smith
{"title":"Defining common criteria for harmonizing life cycle assessments of livestock systems","authors":"Pietro Goglio ,&nbsp;Marie Trydeman Knudsen ,&nbsp;Klara Van Mierlo ,&nbsp;Nina Röhrig ,&nbsp;Maxime Fossey ,&nbsp;Alberto Maresca ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Hashemi ,&nbsp;Muhammad Ahmed Waqas ,&nbsp;Jenny Yngvesson ,&nbsp;Gilles Nassy ,&nbsp;Roline Broekema ,&nbsp;Simon Moakes ,&nbsp;Catherine Pfeifer ,&nbsp;Robert Borek ,&nbsp;David Yanez-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Monica Quevedo Cascante ,&nbsp;Alina Syp ,&nbsp;Tomasz Zylowsky ,&nbsp;Manuel Romero-Huelva ,&nbsp;Laurence G. Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Animal production intensification puts pressure on resources, leads to environmental impacts, animal welfare and biodiversity issues. Livestock products provide key components of the human diet and contribute to rural territories through ecosystem services such as nutrient and biomass recycling. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is key to assess environmental impacts in livestock systems and products. A harmonization of LCA methods is necessary to improve evaluations in these areas as LCA still lacks accuracy and robustness in addressing sustainability across livestock systems and products. Here, a participatory harmonization approach was applied to provide a framework to evaluate LCAs of current and future livestock systems. A total of 29 workshops with targeted discussions among 21 LCA experts were organised, together with two anonymous surveys to harmonise evaluation criteria. First, key research topics for improving LCAs of livestock systems were identified as follows: i) Food, feed, fuel and biomaterial competition, crop-livestock interaction and the circular economy; ii) Biodiversity; iii) Animal welfare; iv) Nutrition; v) GHG emissions. Next, general evaluation criteria were identified for livestock focussed LCA methods, considering livestock systems characteristics: Transparency and Reproducibility, Completeness, Fairness and Acceptance, Robustness and Accuracy. Evaluation criteria specific to each key topic were also identified. This participatory method was successful in narrowing down general and specific evaluation criteria through targeted discussion. Moreover, this study provided a holistic participatory framework for the evaluation of LCA methods addressing the impacts of livestock systems across a range of key topics which can be further used for other sectors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal production intensification puts pressure on resources, leads to environmental impacts, animal welfare and biodiversity issues. Livestock products provide key components of the human diet and contribute to rural territories through ecosystem services such as nutrient and biomass recycling. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is key to assess environmental impacts in livestock systems and products. A harmonization of LCA methods is necessary to improve evaluations in these areas as LCA still lacks accuracy and robustness in addressing sustainability across livestock systems and products. Here, a participatory harmonization approach was applied to provide a framework to evaluate LCAs of current and future livestock systems. A total of 29 workshops with targeted discussions among 21 LCA experts were organised, together with two anonymous surveys to harmonise evaluation criteria. First, key research topics for improving LCAs of livestock systems were identified as follows: i) Food, feed, fuel and biomaterial competition, crop-livestock interaction and the circular economy; ii) Biodiversity; iii) Animal welfare; iv) Nutrition; v) GHG emissions. Next, general evaluation criteria were identified for livestock focussed LCA methods, considering livestock systems characteristics: Transparency and Reproducibility, Completeness, Fairness and Acceptance, Robustness and Accuracy. Evaluation criteria specific to each key topic were also identified. This participatory method was successful in narrowing down general and specific evaluation criteria through targeted discussion. Moreover, this study provided a holistic participatory framework for the evaluation of LCA methods addressing the impacts of livestock systems across a range of key topics which can be further used for other sectors.

确定统一牲畜系统生命周期评估的共同标准
动物生产集约化给资源带来压力,导致环境影响、动物福利和生物多样性问题。畜牧产品是人类饮食的关键组成部分,并通过营养和生物量回收等生态系统服务为农村地区做出贡献。生命周期评估(LCA)是评估畜牧系统和产品环境影响的关键。协调生命周期评价方法对于改进这些领域的评估是必要的,因为生命周期评价在解决畜牧系统和产品的可持续性方面仍然缺乏准确性和稳健性。在这方面,采用了一种参与式协调方法,为评估当前和未来畜牧系统的LCA提供了一个框架。共组织了29次研讨会,21名生命周期评价专家进行了有针对性的讨论,并进行了两次匿名调查,以统一评估标准。首先,确定了改善畜牧系统LCA的关键研究课题如下:i)食品、饲料、燃料和生物材料竞争、作物与牲畜的相互作用和循环经济;ii)生物多样性;iii)动物福利;iv)营养;v) GHG排放。接下来,考虑到牲畜系统的特点,确定了以牲畜为重点的生命周期评价方法的一般评价标准:透明度和再现性、完整性、公平性和可接受性、稳健性和准确性。还确定了每个关键专题的具体评价标准。这种参与性方法通过有针对性的讨论,成功地缩小了一般和具体的评价标准。此外,这项研究为评估LCA方法提供了一个全面的参与框架,该方法涉及一系列关键主题的牲畜系统的影响,可进一步用于其他部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信