Development of the Japanese version of the awareness questionnaire for assessment of self-awareness after acquired brain injury: reliability and validity.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1080/10749357.2023.2271707
Chinaru Kajimoto, Takashi Takebayashi, Yuho Okita, Jennifer Fleming, Shinichi Shimada
{"title":"Development of the Japanese version of the awareness questionnaire for assessment of self-awareness after acquired brain injury: reliability and validity.","authors":"Chinaru Kajimoto, Takashi Takebayashi, Yuho Okita, Jennifer Fleming, Shinichi Shimada","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2023.2271707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evaluation of impaired self-awareness (ISA) after brain injury is not widespread in Japan, and there is a lack of Japanese assessments of self-awareness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To translate the original version of the Awareness Questionnaire (AQ), an instrument for assessing ISA, into Japanese using a validated method and examine its reliability and validity in inpatients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, prospective study enrolled 130 participants. The double-translation process was used to develop the Japanese version of the AQ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected from 120 patients. High intra-rater reliability was observed for the patient (Cronbach's α = 0.824) and clinician samples (Cronbach's α = 0.933). High intra- and inter-rater reliability were found for all AQ items [interclass coefficient (ICC) (1, 1) = 0.828, ICC (2, 1) = 0.852, ICC (3, 1) = 0.848]; however, the sub-item analysis revealed only moderate reliability. Validity assessment revealed a low but significant positive correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.209; <i>p</i> < 0.05) between the Japanese version of the AQ and the Japanese version of the Self-Regulation Skills Interview and a low but significant negative correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.197; <i>p</i> < 0.05) between the Japanese version of the AQ and the Mini-Mental State Examination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Japanese version of the AQ was developed and applied to stroke patients, but the concept of post-stroke ISA may differ from ISA after traumatic brain injury, highlighting the need for a stroke-specific version of the AQ.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"372-380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2023.2271707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The evaluation of impaired self-awareness (ISA) after brain injury is not widespread in Japan, and there is a lack of Japanese assessments of self-awareness.

Objectives: To translate the original version of the Awareness Questionnaire (AQ), an instrument for assessing ISA, into Japanese using a validated method and examine its reliability and validity in inpatients with stroke.

Methods: This cross-sectional, prospective study enrolled 130 participants. The double-translation process was used to develop the Japanese version of the AQ.

Results: Data were collected from 120 patients. High intra-rater reliability was observed for the patient (Cronbach's α = 0.824) and clinician samples (Cronbach's α = 0.933). High intra- and inter-rater reliability were found for all AQ items [interclass coefficient (ICC) (1, 1) = 0.828, ICC (2, 1) = 0.852, ICC (3, 1) = 0.848]; however, the sub-item analysis revealed only moderate reliability. Validity assessment revealed a low but significant positive correlation (r = 0.209; p < 0.05) between the Japanese version of the AQ and the Japanese version of the Self-Regulation Skills Interview and a low but significant negative correlation (r = 0.197; p < 0.05) between the Japanese version of the AQ and the Mini-Mental State Examination.

Conclusions: The Japanese version of the AQ was developed and applied to stroke patients, but the concept of post-stroke ISA may differ from ISA after traumatic brain injury, highlighting the need for a stroke-specific version of the AQ.

用于评估后天性脑损伤后自我意识的日语版意识问卷的开发:可靠性和有效性。
背景:脑损伤后自我意识受损(ISA)的评估在日本并不普遍,日本也缺乏对自我意识的评估。目的:使用经验证的方法将评估ISA的工具——意识问卷(AQ)的原始版本翻译成日语,并在脑卒中住院患者中检验其可靠性和有效性。方法:这项横断面前瞻性研究招募了130名参与者。结果:收集了120例患者的数据。观察到患者具有较高的评分者内部可靠性(Cronbachα = 0.824)和临床医生样本(Cronbachα = 0.933)。所有AQ项目的评分者内和评分者间的可靠性都很高[类间系数(ICC)(1,1) = 0.828,ICC(2,1)=0.852icc(3,1) = 0.848];然而,分项分析显示只有适度的可靠性。有效性评估显示低但显著的正相关(r = 0.209;p r = 0.197;p 结论:日本版本的AQ已开发并应用于中风患者,但中风后ISA的概念可能与创伤性脑损伤后的ISA不同,这突出了对中风特异性版本AQ的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信