Acoustic properties of non-native clear speech: Korean speakers of English

IF 2.4 3区 计算机科学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Ye-Jee Jung, Olga Dmitrieva
{"title":"Acoustic properties of non-native clear speech: Korean speakers of English","authors":"Ye-Jee Jung,&nbsp;Olga Dmitrieva","doi":"10.1016/j.specom.2023.102982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study examined the acoustic properties of clear speech produced by non-native speakers of English (L1 Korean), in comparison to native clear speech. L1 Korean speakers of English (<em>N</em>=30) and native speakers of English (N=20) read an English word-list in casual and clear speaking styles. Analysis included clear speech correlates thought to be universal across languages (vowel space expansion and stressed vowel lengthening) and clear speech modifications believed to function in a languages-specific way (increased mean voice fundamental frequency and <em>f</em><sub>o</sub> range and acoustic enhancement of English voicing contrast via voice onset time and onset <em>f</em><sub>o</sub>). The results showed that across the two groups of participants clear speech was acoustically distinct from casual speech in every parameter. In addition, the presence and direction of the acoustic difference between the two speaking styles was largely the same for both native and non-native speakers. Nevertheless, non-native clear speech differed from native one in the magnitude of acoustic modifications. Specifically, L2 speakers implemented less vowel space expansion, less increase of mean <em>f</em><sub>o</sub>, and less positive and negative VOT lengthening in clear speech than native speakers. Many, but not all differences between native and non-native clear speech could be attributed to the effect of participants’ L1, for example, lower functional load of VOT in the differentiation of Korean laryngeal categories and absence of pitch-dependent system of prosodic prominence in Korean. Overall, we conclude that Korean speakers were successful in producing native-like English clear speech, although the observed deviations in the extent of acoustic modifications suggest some reliance on L1-specific prosodic system and system of phonetic implementation and enhancement of phonological contrasts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49485,"journal":{"name":"Speech Communication","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 102982"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Communication","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167639323001164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study examined the acoustic properties of clear speech produced by non-native speakers of English (L1 Korean), in comparison to native clear speech. L1 Korean speakers of English (N=30) and native speakers of English (N=20) read an English word-list in casual and clear speaking styles. Analysis included clear speech correlates thought to be universal across languages (vowel space expansion and stressed vowel lengthening) and clear speech modifications believed to function in a languages-specific way (increased mean voice fundamental frequency and fo range and acoustic enhancement of English voicing contrast via voice onset time and onset fo). The results showed that across the two groups of participants clear speech was acoustically distinct from casual speech in every parameter. In addition, the presence and direction of the acoustic difference between the two speaking styles was largely the same for both native and non-native speakers. Nevertheless, non-native clear speech differed from native one in the magnitude of acoustic modifications. Specifically, L2 speakers implemented less vowel space expansion, less increase of mean fo, and less positive and negative VOT lengthening in clear speech than native speakers. Many, but not all differences between native and non-native clear speech could be attributed to the effect of participants’ L1, for example, lower functional load of VOT in the differentiation of Korean laryngeal categories and absence of pitch-dependent system of prosodic prominence in Korean. Overall, we conclude that Korean speakers were successful in producing native-like English clear speech, although the observed deviations in the extent of acoustic modifications suggest some reliance on L1-specific prosodic system and system of phonetic implementation and enhancement of phonological contrasts.

非母语清晰语音的声学特性:讲英语的韩国人
本研究考察了非英语母语者(L1韩语)产生的清晰语音与母语清晰语音的声学特性。母语为韩语的英语使用者(N=30)和母语为英语的使用者(N=20)以随意清晰的说话风格阅读英语单词表。分析包括被认为在不同语言中普遍存在的清晰语音相关性(元音空间扩展和重音元音延长)和被认为以特定语言方式发挥作用的清晰语音修饰(增加平均语音基频和fo范围,以及通过语音起始时间和起始fo增强英语语音对比度)。结果表明,在两组参与者中,清晰的言语在每个参数上都与随意的言语在声学上不同。此外,对于母语和非母语的人来说,两种说话风格之间声学差异的存在和方向基本相同。然而,非母语清晰语音与母语清晰语音在声学修饰程度上有所不同。具体而言,与母语人士相比,二语使用者在清晰语音中实现了更少的元音空间扩展、更少的平均值fo增加以及更少的正负VOT延长。母语和非母语清晰语音之间的许多(但不是全部)差异可归因于参与者的L1的影响,例如,在韩语喉类的分化中,VOT的功能负荷较低,以及在韩语中缺乏音调依赖的韵律突出系统。总的来说,我们得出的结论是,说韩语的人成功地产生了类似母语英语的清晰语音,尽管观察到的声学修饰程度的偏差表明,他们在一定程度上依赖于L1特定的韵律系统和语音实现系统,并增强了语音对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Speech Communication
Speech Communication 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Speech Communication is an interdisciplinary journal whose primary objective is to fulfil the need for the rapid dissemination and thorough discussion of basic and applied research results. The journal''s primary objectives are: • to present a forum for the advancement of human and human-machine speech communication science; • to stimulate cross-fertilization between different fields of this domain; • to contribute towards the rapid and wide diffusion of scientifically sound contributions in this domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信