Mapping tree species diversity of temperate forests using multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and -2 imagery

IF 5.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yanbiao Xi , Wenmin Zhang , Martin Brandt , Qingjiu Tian , Rasmus Fensholt
{"title":"Mapping tree species diversity of temperate forests using multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and -2 imagery","authors":"Yanbiao Xi ,&nbsp;Wenmin Zhang ,&nbsp;Martin Brandt ,&nbsp;Qingjiu Tian ,&nbsp;Rasmus Fensholt","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2023.100094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurate information on tree species diversity is critical for forest biodiversity, conservation and management, but mapping forest diversity over large and mixed forest areas using satellite remote sensing data remains a challenge because of scale- and ecosystem-dependent relationships between spectral heterogeneity and tree species diversity. In this study, three different diversity indices (Simpson (λ), Shannon (H’), and Pielou (J’)), were tested to characterize forest tree species diversity using individual monthly and multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and -2 images during 2021. The performance of three different machine learning models, Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Deep Neural Network (DNN) were tested. A collection of 1,020 plot measurements (comprising 47 tree species and 28,122 trees), randomly collected in a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest area in northeast China, was used to train (n = 816) and validate (n = 204) the models. The models dependent on multi-temporal Sentinel-1/2 imagery were found to outperform the models based on individual monthly data, in predicting forest tree species diversity, with average accuracies of 78% for H’, 77% for λ and 77% for J’. The use of DNN performed marginally better than the XGB and RF models, with accuracies of 81% for H’, 80% for λ and 79% for J’, respectively. Finally, a boosted regression model, involving environmental variable predictors and the DNN-based estimated tree species diversity, showed that on average 63 ± 4% of the spatial variations of tree species diversity was explained by environmental variables, including annual temperature (29.30%), followed by soil fertility (27.03%), snow cover (13.63%) and a digital elevation model (12.33%). Our results highlight that an empirical approach based on machine learning and multi-temporal Sentinel-1/2 data can accurately predict forest tree species diversity and we further show the important roles of air temperature and soil fertility in governing the spatial variability of tree species diversity in a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest setting.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100094"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017223000196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Accurate information on tree species diversity is critical for forest biodiversity, conservation and management, but mapping forest diversity over large and mixed forest areas using satellite remote sensing data remains a challenge because of scale- and ecosystem-dependent relationships between spectral heterogeneity and tree species diversity. In this study, three different diversity indices (Simpson (λ), Shannon (H’), and Pielou (J’)), were tested to characterize forest tree species diversity using individual monthly and multi-temporal Sentinel-1 and -2 images during 2021. The performance of three different machine learning models, Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Deep Neural Network (DNN) were tested. A collection of 1,020 plot measurements (comprising 47 tree species and 28,122 trees), randomly collected in a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest area in northeast China, was used to train (n = 816) and validate (n = 204) the models. The models dependent on multi-temporal Sentinel-1/2 imagery were found to outperform the models based on individual monthly data, in predicting forest tree species diversity, with average accuracies of 78% for H’, 77% for λ and 77% for J’. The use of DNN performed marginally better than the XGB and RF models, with accuracies of 81% for H’, 80% for λ and 79% for J’, respectively. Finally, a boosted regression model, involving environmental variable predictors and the DNN-based estimated tree species diversity, showed that on average 63 ± 4% of the spatial variations of tree species diversity was explained by environmental variables, including annual temperature (29.30%), followed by soil fertility (27.03%), snow cover (13.63%) and a digital elevation model (12.33%). Our results highlight that an empirical approach based on machine learning and multi-temporal Sentinel-1/2 data can accurately predict forest tree species diversity and we further show the important roles of air temperature and soil fertility in governing the spatial variability of tree species diversity in a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest setting.

利用Sentinel-1和sentinel -2多时相影像绘制温带森林树种多样性
关于树种多样性的准确信息对于森林生物多样性、保护和管理至关重要,但由于光谱异质性和树种多样性之间的规模和生态系统依赖关系,使用卫星遥感数据绘制大面积和混合林区的森林多样性图仍然是一项挑战。在这项研究中,使用2021年的单个月和多时相Sentinel-1和-2图像,测试了三种不同的多样性指数(Simpson(λ)、Shannon(H')和Pielou(J')),以表征森林树种的多样性。测试了随机森林(RF)、极限梯度提升(XGB)和深度神经网络(DNN)三种不同机器学习模型的性能。在中国东北的一个针阔混交林地区随机收集了1020个样地测量数据(包括47个树种和28122棵树),用于训练(n=816)和验证(n=204)模型。在预测森林树种多样性方面,依赖于多时相Sentinel-1/2图像的模型优于基于单个月数据的模型,H'、λ和J'的平均准确率分别为78%、77%和77%。DNN的使用表现略好于XGB和RF模型,H'的准确率分别为81%、λ的准确率为80%和J'的准确度为79%。最后,一个包含环境变量预测因子和基于DNN的估计树种多样性的增强回归模型显示,平均63±4%的树种多样性空间变化由环境变量解释,包括年温度(29.30%),其次是土壤肥力(27.03%),雪覆盖率(13.63%)和数字高程模型(12.33%)。我们的结果强调,基于机器学习和多时相Sentinel1/2数据的经验方法可以准确预测森林树种多样性,并进一步表明了气温和土壤肥力在控制阔叶-针叶树树种多样性空间变异中的重要作用森林环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信