Separating the wheat from the chaff: Bayesian regularization in dynamic social networks

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Diana Karimova , Roger Th.A.J. Leenders , Marlyne Meijerink-Bosman , Joris Mulder
{"title":"Separating the wheat from the chaff: Bayesian regularization in dynamic social networks","authors":"Diana Karimova ,&nbsp;Roger Th.A.J. Leenders ,&nbsp;Marlyne Meijerink-Bosman ,&nbsp;Joris Mulder","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2023.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years there has been an increasing interest in the use of relational event models for dynamic social network analysis. The basis of these models is the concept of an “event”, defined as a triplet of time, sender, and receiver of some social interaction. The key question that relational event models aim to answer is what drives the pattern of social interactions among actors. Researchers often consider a very large number of predictors in their studies (including exogenous effects, endogenous network effects, and interaction effects). However, employing an excessive number of effects may lead to overfitting and inflated Type-I error rates. Moreover, the fitted model can easily become overly complex and the implied social interaction behavior difficult to interpret. A potential solution to this problem is to apply Bayesian regularization using shrinkage priors to recognize which effects are truly nonzero (the “wheat”) and which effects can be considered as (largely) irrelevant (the “chaff”). In this paper, we propose Bayesian regularization methods for relational event models using four different priors for both an actor and a dyad relational event model: a flat prior model with no shrinkage, a ridge estimator with a normal prior, a Bayesian lasso with a Laplace prior, and a horseshoe prior. We apply these regularization methods in three different empirical applications. The results reveal that Bayesian regularization can be used to separate the wheat from the chaff in models with a large number of effects by yielding considerably fewer significant effects, resulting in a more parsimonious description of the social interaction behavior between actors in dynamic social networks, without sacrificing predictive performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"74 ","pages":"Pages 139-155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873323000217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recent years there has been an increasing interest in the use of relational event models for dynamic social network analysis. The basis of these models is the concept of an “event”, defined as a triplet of time, sender, and receiver of some social interaction. The key question that relational event models aim to answer is what drives the pattern of social interactions among actors. Researchers often consider a very large number of predictors in their studies (including exogenous effects, endogenous network effects, and interaction effects). However, employing an excessive number of effects may lead to overfitting and inflated Type-I error rates. Moreover, the fitted model can easily become overly complex and the implied social interaction behavior difficult to interpret. A potential solution to this problem is to apply Bayesian regularization using shrinkage priors to recognize which effects are truly nonzero (the “wheat”) and which effects can be considered as (largely) irrelevant (the “chaff”). In this paper, we propose Bayesian regularization methods for relational event models using four different priors for both an actor and a dyad relational event model: a flat prior model with no shrinkage, a ridge estimator with a normal prior, a Bayesian lasso with a Laplace prior, and a horseshoe prior. We apply these regularization methods in three different empirical applications. The results reveal that Bayesian regularization can be used to separate the wheat from the chaff in models with a large number of effects by yielding considerably fewer significant effects, resulting in a more parsimonious description of the social interaction behavior between actors in dynamic social networks, without sacrificing predictive performance.

从谷壳中分离小麦:动态社会网络中的贝叶斯正则化
近年来,人们对使用关系事件模型进行动态社交网络分析越来越感兴趣。这些模型的基础是“事件”的概念,定义为一些社交互动的时间、发送者和接收者的三元组。关系事件模型旨在回答的关键问题是,是什么驱动了参与者之间的社会互动模式。研究人员在研究中经常考虑大量的预测因素(包括外源效应、内源性网络效应和相互作用效应)。然而,使用过多的效果可能会导致过拟合和I型错误率的膨胀。此外,拟合模型很容易变得过于复杂,隐含的社会互动行为很难解释。这个问题的一个潜在解决方案是使用收缩先验应用贝叶斯正则化,以识别哪些影响是真正的非零(“小麦”),哪些影响可以被认为(在很大程度上)无关(“谷壳”)。在本文中,我们提出了关系事件模型的贝叶斯正则化方法,该方法对参与者和二元关系事件模型使用四种不同的先验:无收缩的平面先验模型、具有正态先验的岭估计器、具有拉普拉斯先验的贝叶斯套索和马蹄形先验。我们将这些正则化方法应用于三种不同的经验应用中。结果表明,在不牺牲预测性能的情况下,贝叶斯正则化可以用于在具有大量影响的模型中分离小麦和谷壳,产生的显著影响要少得多,从而对动态社交网络中参与者之间的社交行为进行更简约的描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信