A theory of moral categorization: The conceptual performance of moral cognition

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Ariel James
{"title":"A theory of moral categorization: The conceptual performance of moral cognition","authors":"Ariel James","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"71 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X23000405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
道德范畴化理论:道德认知的概念表现
根据一些传统的分类理论,人类通过判断某个案例的相关特征与代表该案例的概念的明确特征之间的相似性,在概念上代表现实。然而,具有道德意义的抽象概念与它们所代表的案例并不具有现象学上的相似性。此外,通常在道德判断中使用的概念会受到语义变化的影响。相反,本文提出道德分类是基于操作测试的,该测试验证在每个特定情况下是否观察到某些非个人(通用)和无条件的命令。道德分类的过程是用一种称为“测试命令分类”的认知程序来描述的,包括五个步骤,即:描述阶段、非规范性评价、规范性问题、条件规则和类别解释。最后,分析了应用于道德认知领域的语义极性和语义变异现象,以表明所提出的模型如何解决这些解释机制的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信